On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013,
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1,
If content is noticed and there is concern that there may be legal
ramifications, it seems reasonable that the content would be immediately
modified before review, which is what was done.
So if I seem something that is wrong, should I fix it, or should I ask
the person that made the initial
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Tim Williams
...
Then count me uncool then. I did it and I'd do it again in similar
circumstances. It is easier to apologize to David later If I'm wrong
then for us to have the trademark legally invalidated if I was right
and did not act quickly.
Joe Schaefer wrote:
This tempest in a teapot is not about
a wayward revert as you did not completely
back out the commit- you just patched it.
Exactly. It is rather clear from here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext?r1=1419051r2=1441659diff_format=h
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Da: Andrea Pescetti
...
Joe Schaefer wrote:
This tempest in a teapot is not about
a wayward revert as you did not completely
back out the commit- you just patched it.
Exactly. It is rather
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Da: Andrea Pescetti
...
Joe Schaefer wrote:
This tempest in a teapot is not about
a wayward revert as you did not
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
...
So, if you are planning to revert someone elses change and it's really
urgent please
take the time and write a polite message *before* reverting saying:
Hello Dave,
I have no problem with the change that you made, and I said so in my initial
reply.
My problem is the way that you characterized it. You can be more polite. For
example, I like the link you added, but I think that the (R) is not correct
and so I removed it...
That is all I'm going to say
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote:
I have no problem with the change that you made, and I said so in my initial
reply.
My problem is the way that you characterized it. You can be more polite. For
example, I like the link you added, but I think that the (R)
Am 03.02.2013 03:33, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
...
So, if you are planning to revert someone elses change and it's really
urgent please
take the time and write a polite message *before* reverting saying:
Hello Dave, I think this is a
Everything has been said in this thread, Godwin´s law has been invoked.
Unless new information is injected, I ask you let it go and stop this
thread.
Regards,
Andre
Hello;
You are right. My comparison was insensible and way out of line.
I apologize and I will take a break from the lists for a while.
Pedro.
13 matches
Mail list logo
