Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-05-04 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro, Am 04.05.21 um 16:51 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi all > > The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;) > Small victories on May the Fourth! Yes! And thank you for using the 4th... Matthias > > All the best, > Pedro > > >> On

Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-05-04 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;) Small victories on May the Fourth! All the best, Pedro > On 03/30/2021 5:19 PM Marcus wrote: > > > Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino: >

Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-03-30 Thread Marcus
Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino: Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ (that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago) the answer from the Sourceforge staff

Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-03-30 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro, Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi all > > Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at > https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ > (that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago) > > the answer from the Sourceforge staff wa

Sourceforge project activity feedback

2021-03-30 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi all Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ (that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago) the answer from the Sourceforge staff was > On 03/24/2021 4:15 PM SourceForge.net Support & Ops > wrote: >

Re: Impossible to download from sourceforge

2020-04-26 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello Joseph, SourceForge is a long time trusted partner. We have a simple Download page that helps to select the Version you need. https://www.openoffice.org/download/ Do you have issues with this page? What Platform do you use? All the Best Peter Am 26.04.20 um 19:35 schrieb Joseph

Impossible to download from sourceforge

2020-04-26 Thread Joseph MICHEL
Hello, Please, never put your downloads on sourceforge site. The display is complete mess. Impossible to download from there. Where can I download openoffice from ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: Violent PopUp window on SourceForge

2019-10-10 Thread Pedro Lino
Popups on Sourceforge are not Apache OpenOffice responsibility ;) You can always download directly from the Apache archives if you know which files to get http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/ > On October 10, 2019 at 3:13 PM Matic Smerdu > wrote: > > > I tried to down

Violent PopUp window on SourceForge

2019-10-10 Thread Matic Smerdu
I tried to download OpenOffice 4.1.7 from SourceForge. But you a tooo evil with your Advertising. I closed totaly AdBlockPlus for all pages, but no difference. Will I never be able to get openoffice again without these violent popups

Building while SourceForge is down

2018-03-03 Thread Andrea Pescetti
As discussed in https://s.apache.org/sHGE we can't do a clean build while SourceForge is down, to to the fact that oooextras.mirror (where we keep some libraries) is unreachable. I've created a temporary mirror with the files I had locally and with some more files (especially extensions

Re: Access to SourceForge

2018-01-22 Thread Marcus
Am 21.01.2018 um 17:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can one of the admins provide me access to our SourceForge page? My SourceForge name is seidelm: https://sourceforge.net/u/seidelm/profile/ done. Due to your usual work I've added you to the Admin group. Marcus

Access to SourceForge

2018-01-21 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi, Can one of the admins provide me access to our SourceForge page? My SourceForge name is seidelm: https://sourceforge.net/u/seidelm/profile/ Regards, Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: SourceForge (new look)

2018-01-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Dave, Am 16.01.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Dave Brondsema: > On 1/13/18 10:21 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema: >>> On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Since yesterday (?) Sourc

Re: SourceForge (new look)

2018-01-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Dave, Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema: > On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look: >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ >> >> While I have to get used to the colors, it f

Re: SourceForge (new look)

2018-01-11 Thread Marcus
Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema: On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look: https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ While I have to get used to the colors, it feels like the AOO downloads are much more

Re: SourceForge (new look)

2018-01-11 Thread Dave Brondsema
On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ > > While I have to get used to the colors, it feels like the AOO downloads > are much more responsive now. > Glad you

SourceForge (new look)

2018-01-10 Thread Matthias Seidel
Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look: https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ While I have to get used to the colors, it feels like the AOO downloads are much more responsive now. Regards, Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Request] SourceForge permissions for uploading release

2017-12-22 Thread Carl Marcum
On 12/22/2017 07:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me permissions so I can upload the release? Done. Thank you and enjoy! We now have 6 PMC members as administrators of that area, so we should be well covered

Re: [Request] SourceForge permissions for uploading release

2017-12-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Carl Marcum wrote: Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me permissions so I can upload the release? Done. Thank you and enjoy! We now have 6 PMC members as administrators of that area, so we should be well covered. Regards, Andrea

[Request] SourceForge permissions for uploading release

2017-12-21 Thread Carl Marcum
Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me permissions so I can upload the release? My SF username is cmarcum. Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz missing on Sourceforge

2017-11-24 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 24.11.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> It seems that "openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz" is missing on Sourceforge (OOO >> Extras): >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ > > Added earlier today, should be v

Re: openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz missing on Sourceforge

2017-11-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Matthias Seidel wrote: It seems that "openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz" is missing on Sourceforge (OOO Extras): https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ Added earlier today, should be visible now. More admins can always be added to our SourceForge area, just provide the S

openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz missing on Sourceforge

2017-11-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
It seems that "openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz" is missing on Sourceforge (OOO Extras): https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ The fallback URL defined in "external_deps.lst" points to: http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz At the moment our Linux bui

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 13/10/2017 Andrea Pescetti wrote: Our SourceForge area is now updated with files from revision 22458 from the dev area (this revision includes the rebuilt Linux-64 binaries). Now updated again to revision 22553 (this one includes the rebuilt OS X binaries). As expected, the only modified

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
d allows us to >> update the download pages any moment after the vote passes. > > Our SourceForge area is now updated with files from revision 22458 from the > dev area (this revision includes the rebuilt Linux-64 binaries). > > Everything is still staged (unavailab

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
r the vote passes. Our SourceForge area is now updated with files from revision 22458 from the dev area (this revision includes the rebuilt Linux-64 binaries). Everything is still staged (unavailable to the public), but we can count on propagation to mirrors to be completed well in advance of when

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-12 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 11/10/2017 Don Lewis wrote: That's a good way to reduce the time to the official release, but if we had done this for RC4, then the release would have been happened before the latest regression was reported. Yes, the idea is not to give people another opportunity to block the release! Just

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Sounds like a great plan! > On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not > public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area > (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). > This is the place where our official binaries are served from. > > Instead of waiting

Re: Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-11 Thread Marcus
Am 11.10.2017 um 23:29 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the place where our official binaries are served from. Instead of waiting for a succe

Upload of 4.1.4-RC5 to SourceForge

2017-10-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the place where our official binaries are served from. Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I will gradually upload

Re: Contact to SourceForge

2017-02-15 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Dave Brondsema is our contact. May I ask you what is the problem you're trying to solve? Roberto 2017-02-15 22:52 GMT+01:00 Raphael Bircher <rbircherapa...@gmail.com>: > Hi all > > I search our contact to SourceForge. Has anyone the information? > > Regards Raphael >

Contact to SourceForge

2017-02-15 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi all I search our contact to SourceForge. Has anyone the information? Regards Raphael -- Mein Blog: https://raphaelbircher.blogspot.ch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

2016-10-13 Thread Marcus
s still pointing to 4.1.2. I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... regards Matthias Clear your browser cache and 4.1.3 will show up. I took the liberty of changing this just a few minutes ago. It would be good to include this in the release instructions. After making the folder u

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

2016-10-13 Thread Dave Brondsema
to 4.1.2. >> >> I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... >> >> regards >> >> Matthias >> > > Clear your browser cache and 4.1.3 will show up. > I took the liberty of changing this just a few minutes ago. It would be good to include

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

2016-10-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
t; The "latest version" on >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still >>> pointing to 4.1.2. >>> >>> I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Matthias &

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

2016-10-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still >> pointing to 4.1.2. >> >> I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... >> >> regards >> >> Matthias >> > Clear your browser cache and 4.1.3 will show up. > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

2016-10-13 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200 Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > The "latest version" on > https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still > pointing to 4.1.2. > > I think this had to be set manually on sourceforg

"Latest version" on Sourceforge

2016-10-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
The "latest version" on https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still pointing to 4.1.2. I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... regards Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-08 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Patience! Let's see what Roberto has to say Something has been puzzling me lately. What if this is delliberate?. I mean, people setting up these "fake AOO" sites and then joining the SF.net advertisers network only to

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-08 Thread Roberto Galoppini
the timeliness of removing ad violations, but it needs end-users' input. With regard to our direct sales and partner advertisers, they remain active and in full compliance with SourceForge ad quality specifications and policies, and we never had similar issues with them. Stay tuned, I will circle back with you

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-08 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/01/2016 20:54, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > Thanks for your patience, what follows it's the result of a joint meet ing > with our AdOps team and our Managing Director. Is "our AdOps team" a SourceForge team, or an Apache Sof

OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread FR web forum
for other projets, I think Apache must not accept such situation: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2931575/open-source-tools/sourceforge-fail-itbwcw.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Roberto, Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad that has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content? I understand there are technical challenges. If that is difficult is it possible to simply block all ads? Regards, Dave

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Thanks for heads up, both the account and its creatives have been blocked. Roberto 2016-01-07 15:38 GMT+01:00 FR web forum : > > Today, we have 2 users that have pay for a fake OpenOffice2015 > > >

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread donaldupre .
+1 for a divorce :) On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Roberto Galoppini < roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for heads up, both the account and its creatives have been blocked. > > Roberto > > 2016-01-07 15:38 GMT+01:00 FR web forum : > > > > > Today, we have 2 users

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread Dave Fisher
The choice to go with sourceforge was not about stats. OpenOffice binaries are quite substantial. There was concern about if all the Apache mirrors could handle the load. Patience! Let's see what Roberto has to say. SourceForge has been generous. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Ja

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad > that has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content? It's not as simple as that, some evildoers crea

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread Jan Høydahl
> Hi Roberto, > > Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad that > has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content? > > I understand there are technical challenges. If that is difficult is it > possible to simply block a

Re: OpenOffice and SourceForge: cruel wedding

2016-01-07 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > Apache’s mirrors already have the binaries, and should handle the load. It has been argued repeatedly that they wouldn't. FC

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-12-10 Thread FR web forum
t; À: "dev" <dev@openoffice.apache.org>, "Cyril Beaussier" <ooofo...@free.fr> Envoyé: Mardi 10 Novembre 2015 10:35:16 Objet: Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads Thanks for heads up, could you kindly pass me the exact link? Send me also a direct message if you prefer. Roberto

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-12-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
t;>, "Cyril Beaussier" < > ooofo...@free.fr <javascript:;>> > Envoyé: Mardi 10 Novembre 2015 10:35:16 > Objet: Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads > > Thanks for heads up, could you kindly pass me the exact link? Send me also > a direct message if you pref

RE: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Roberto, thanks for this. Comments in-line > -Original Message- > From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 14:23 > To: dev <dev@openoffice.apache.org> > Subject: Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.

Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-22 Thread Roberto Galoppini
; To: dev <dev@openoffice.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2] > > > > 2015-11-21 19:28 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>: > > > > > [not cross-posting] > > > > > > SourceForge is

SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Dave Barton
Is it not time to _*SERIOUSLY*_ review the distribution of our binaries via SourceForge? Rory O'Farrell and others dutifully expend their valuable time advising "unaware" users NOT to click on download links and buttons after they are redirected to the Sourc

RE: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[not cross-posting] SourceForge is valuable to the project for providing the mirror capacity that AOO requires. The penalty is in regard to user distrust and these awful situations that the list and Forum folks have to contend with. As far as our users are concerned, it is the AOO project

Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dave Barton wrote: I do not understand, or find any reasonable explanation, why our download page does not redirect to the ASF's own mirror network: https://www.apache.org/mirrors/ where our binaries are already being served by 200+ mirrors around the world. Leaving all the SourceForge

Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2015-11-21 19:28 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>: > [not cross-posting] > > SourceForge is valuable to the project for providing the mirror capacity > that AOO requires. The penalty is in regard to user distrust and these > awful situations that the list

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-11-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Thanks for heads up, could you kindly pass me the exact link? Send me also a direct message if you prefer. Roberto 2015-11-10 10:23 GMT+01:00 FR web forum : > Hello list, > > New ad to have a fake AOO: > http://www.cjoint.com/c/EKkjxfqjgbA > Jump to a para-site: >

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-11-10 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO: http://www.cjoint.com/c/EKkjxfqjgbA Jump to a para-site: h**p:/opf.goltus.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-24 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:01:58 +0200 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote: AOO Extensions is ok since yesterday, AOO Templates is finally back too. Just checked on two computers. Working correctly - thanks, Roberto. If you get the SourceForge holding page you should delete your

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-24 Thread Roberto Galoppini
for the inconvenience, are we're doing our best to take it back asap. Roberto Thanks for the update, Roberto. 2015-07-22 10:48 GMT+02:00 Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie: This is not a complaint, just a comment for information: After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-24 Thread Marcus
I've just checked on the webpage. It's working for both. Thanks to everybody at Sourceforge for bring it back online. :-) Marcus Am 07/24/2015 10:01 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: AOO Extensions is ok since yesterday, AOO Templates is finally back too. 2015-07-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 Rory

AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-22 Thread Rory O'Farrell
This is not a complaint, just a comment for information: After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the AOO download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the detailed pages previously linked. Of course, restoration may still be in process; if so, please

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rory O'Farrell wrote: After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the AOO download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the detailed pages previously linked. Links on the http://www.openoffice.org/download page are unchanged. So the redirection is with all

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-22 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:35:15 +0200 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rory O'Farrell wrote: After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the AOO download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the detailed pages previously linked. Links on the http

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-22 Thread Roberto Galoppini
delivery path, with dedicated backups. We are really sorry for the inconvenience, are we're doing our best to take it back asap. Roberto 2015-07-22 10:48 GMT+02:00 Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie: This is not a complaint, just a comment for information: After the recent SourceForge outage

Re: AOO extensions/templates after SourceForge outage

2015-07-22 Thread Rory O'Farrell
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie: This is not a complaint, just a comment for information: After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the AOO download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the detailed pages previously linked. Of course, restoration may

Re: Sourceforge

2015-06-05 Thread imacat
hijacked GIMP for Windows without authors' consent. Goodbye, SourceForge. https://helb.github.io/goodbye-sourceforge/ Anatomy of SourceForge/GIMP controversy (from GIMP team) http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/anatomy-of-sourceforge-gimp-controversy What happened to Sourceforge? (from VLC

Re: Sourceforge

2015-06-05 Thread Rory O'Farrell
, SourceForge. https://helb.github.io/goodbye-sourceforge/ Anatomy of SourceForge/GIMP controversy (from GIMP team) http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/anatomy-of-sourceforge-gimp-controversy What happened to Sourceforge? (from VLC developer) https://blog.l0cal.com/2015/06/02/what-happened

Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-05-27 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. Jump to a para-site: h**p://www.sutuul.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-05-27 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Hi, I need the original link, and possibly a screenshot, thanks. Roberto 2015-05-27 10:51 GMT+02:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. Jump to a para-site: h**p://www.sutuul.com -

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-05-27 Thread Roberto Galoppini
It has been removed, thanks for heads up. 2015-05-27 11:10 GMT+02:00 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com: Hi, I need the original link, and possibly a screenshot, thanks. Roberto 2015-05-27 10:51 GMT+02:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: Hello list, New ad to have a fake

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-02-13 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be removed shortly. roberto 2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. See: http://hpics.li/73a635e This ad jump to a para-site: h**p://www.maribiz.net

Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-02-13 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. See: http://hpics.li/73a635e This ad jump to a para-site: h**p://www.maribiz.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-02-13 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Just confirming it has been blocked 5 mins ago. Thanks again, Roberto 2015-02-13 17:29 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com: Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be removed shortly. roberto 2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum

Re: SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-12-11 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Just realised I forgot to mention we have removed that in the very same day. Thanks for heads up. Roberto 2014-12-09 15:44 GMT+01:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: See today: http://hpics.li/5e52083 This ad go to h**p://maribiz.net

Re: SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-12-09 Thread FR web forum
See today: http://hpics.li/5e52083 This ad go to h**p://maribiz.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-11-21 Thread Roberto Galoppini
networks like Google allow that to happen, and that's where the problem comes from. Thanks for the info. At least we know who to blame. I wrote the above under the assumption that Sourceforge ran its own online adverts network. I was just providing some context, we are responsible for what

Re: SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-11-20 Thread Roberto Galoppini
this. IMHO this needs to stop. It should be something as simple as a section in the SourceForge terms of service for its advertisers banning adverts that impersonate or mention FOSS projects hosted on sourceforge.net, maybe adding something about deceptive advertising or deceptive clicking

Re: SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-11-20 Thread Fernando Cassia
comes from. Thanks for the info. At least we know who to blame. I wrote the above under the assumption that Sourceforge ran its own online adverts network. FC

SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-11-19 Thread Bernard Marcelly
And then the Conditions : chapter 0. Objet: services offered by FULLTIME NETWORKS LIMITED., adresse 2 Martin House, 179-181 North End Road, Londres W14 9NL, Reino Unido chapter 1. Service Premium : Les frais de service s'élèvera à 4.50 Eur par code + prix sms. SourceForge intentionally delays the real download by 5

Re: SourceForge and commercial ads - continued

2014-11-19 Thread Fernando Cassia
And then the Conditions : chapter 0. Objet: services offered by FULLTIME NETWORKS LIMITED., adresse 2 Martin House, 179-181 North End Road, Londres W14 9NL, Reino Unido IMHO this needs to stop. It should be something as simple as a section in the SourceForge terms of service for its advertisers banning adverts

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2014-11-17 Thread FR web forum
Thanks for heads up, I've passed this onto our AdOps team, will get that removed in few hours. Seems to be continue A bug report has been created: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125872 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2014-11-17 Thread Roberto Galoppini
The above mentioned ads has been removed from the catalog, it will disappear in the next hour. Sorry for the inconvenience, I've asked our AdOps team to put a tighter control on ads. Roberto 2014-11-17 16:01 GMT+01:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: Thanks for heads up, I've passed this onto

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2014-09-03 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. See: http://hpics.li/c0340e7 This ad jump to a para-site: h**p://openoffice.updateavenue.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2014-09-03 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Thanks for heads up, I've passed it over to our AdOps to remove it. Roberto Il mercoledì 3 settembre 2014, FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr ha scritto: Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. See: http://hpics.li/c0340e7 This ad jump to a para-site: h**p://openoffice.updateavenue.com

[INFO] Your project is a Project of the Week on SourceForge!

2014-08-27 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, I am a project owner of the AOO project at SourceForge that is mainly used to handle the binary artifacts for our releases. You know I do the upload of the binaries etc. I was informed that AOO was one of the projects of the week. And I thought it is worth to share it with you

Sourceforge and commercial ads

2014-07-16 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, Since a couple of weeks, french users encounter problems to download AOO. SF.net shows commercial ads that jump to para-site and fraudulous builds. Example: http://hpics.li/99fceea - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2014-07-16 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Please provide me the exact link and I'll make sure to remove that from the OpenOffice download page. thanks for heads up. Roberto 2014-07-16 9:35 GMT+02:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: Hello list, Since a couple of weeks, french users encounter problems to download AOO. SF.net shows

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-06-28 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 27/05/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote: Herbert Duerr wrote: The localized and stable folders only provide the old 3.2.x, 3.3.0 and 3.4.x releases, so getting more than 28000 weekly downloads there is an alarming signal. ... This could be our fault too. It seems that localized is mainly used to

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-28 Thread Roberto Galoppini
in one week) and we can add a README.txt or something if you believe people are browsing the SourceForge file tree and getting lost; but files are there, they are being heavily downloaded and removing there immediately would simply cause confusion. Excellent analysis, and I totally agree

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-28 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 27.05.2014 20:58, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 05/27/2014 05:46 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: We still allow for downloads of legacy OOo, so it would probably be better to move the older versions to something like our current structure -- your second option above? +1 And, should the older

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-28 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
(let's see what Danish looks like in one week) and we can add a README.txt or something if you believe people are browsing the SourceForge file tree and getting lost; but files are there, they are being heavily downloaded and removing there immediately would simply cause confusion. Regards

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-28 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Herbert Duerr wrote: the five files - localized/pl/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_pl.exe - localized/es/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_es.exe - localized/nb/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_nb.exe -

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-28 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2014-05-28 13:46 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org: Herbert Duerr wrote: the five files - localized/pl/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_ Win_x86_install_pl.exe - localized/es/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_ Win_x86_install_es.exe -

cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-27 Thread Herbert Duerr
I just noticed that many people seem to download AOO directly from sourceforge and that the directory structure obviously misleads them to download obsolete binaries. Here is the top-level layout and its weekly download count: 4.1.0:843,483 weekly downloads localized: 25,891 weekly

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-27 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: I just noticed that many people seem to download AOO directly from sourceforge and that the directory structure obviously misleads them to download obsolete binaries. Here is the top-level layout and its weekly download

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-27 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 05/27/2014 05:00 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr: I just noticed that many people seem to download AOO directly from sourceforge and that the directory structure obviously misleads them to download obsolete binaries. Here is the top-level layout and its weekly download count: 4.1.0: 843,483 weekly

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

2014-05-27 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 05/27/2014 05:46 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Herbert Duerrh...@apache.org wrote: I just noticed that many people seem to download AOO directly from sourceforge and that the directory structure obviously misleads them to download obsolete binaries. Here

  1   2   >