> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
> release manager :)
> [...]
> Comments? Feedback?
I am ready for the translation of the release notes into German.
We should remember to take care in time to the organization (creation a
> On May 25, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>> release manager :)
>
> OK, perfect!
>
>> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>> latest.
>
> I don't think nex
That was the link I was looking for! ;-)
Will try the ones from 4.1.2 in my next build.
Regards, Matthias
Am 25.05.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options,
>> but they work (for me).
On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)
OK, perfect!
As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest.
I don't think next week is realistic, since the process takes longer.
Still, if the idea is to
On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options,
but they work (for me).
Release options are here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
The ones from 4.1.2 are correct, the ones from 4.1.3 are not (so pleas
Good to know...
Time to update the Release Schedule on cWiki? ;-)
Regards, Matthias
Am 24.05.2017 um 20:37 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 24.05.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>> release manager :)
>
> yes, you are. There was no vote or oth
Am 24.05.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)
yes, you are. There was no vote or other formal process. Just a proposal
and nobody objected. So, sometimes it comes fast and easy. :-)
Marcus
As such, I think we sho
Awesome!
Am 24. Mai 2017 14:06:17 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>release manager :)
>
>As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
>4.1.4. As such, HEAD of
>
Hi Raphael,
SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Microsoft_SDKs/Windows/v7.0"
./configure \
--with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" \
--with-psdk-home="$SDK_PATH" \
--with-midl-path="$SDK_PATH/bin" \
--with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.9" \
--with-jdk-home="C:/PROGRA~1/Java/JDK17~1.0_8" \
-
Hi Matthias
Am .05.2017, 16:21 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
Hi Raphael,
I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I
am not sure if I use the correct configure.
(Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...)
What is PSDK referring to?
I th
Hi Raphael,
I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I
am not sure if I use the correct configure.
(Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...)
What is PSDK referring to?
Matthias
P.S.: I followed this guide:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/D
Hi All
I have still a fight with the Windows SDK. For some reasons, PSDK is not
recognized.
Regards, Raphael
Am .05.2017, 14:06 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)
As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week
I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)
As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
4.1.4. As such, HEAD of http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/
represents what
Hi Jim
Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
want to subject ourselves to the risk, even
I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.
--
15 matches
Mail list logo