On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> We would probably want to confirm with the original author for any
>> pre-Apache patches, to make sure that the patch is given under ALv2.
>> The exception might be those who were Sun/Oracle/IBM employees at the
>> tim
Rob Weir wrote:
We would probably want to confirm with the original author for any
pre-Apache patches, to make sure that the patch is given under ALv2.
The exception might be those who were Sun/Oracle/IBM employees at the
time.
Could we try to have a clearer picture here, limited to patches tha
On 22 December 2013 21:12, jan i wrote:
> On 22 December 2013 21:13, Rob Weir wrote:
>> We would probably want to confirm with the original author for any
>> pre-Apache patches, to make sure that the patch is given under ALv2.
>> The exception might be those who were Sun/Oracle/IBM employees at
On 22 December 2013 21:13, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we have lots of bug reports with unused patches. I think patches should
> be
> > checked as soon as possible and be integrated as soon as
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we have lots of bug reports with unused patches. I think patches should be
> checked as soon as possible and be integrated as soon as possible.
>
> Example:
> I found 31 Bugs with unused patches by Kohei
Hi all,
we have lots of bug reports with unused patches. I think patches should
be checked as soon as possible and be integrated as soon as possible.
Example:
I found 31 Bugs with unused patches by Kohei Yoshida - I think we can't
get progress in Calc any cheaper.
And also the other
