FTR: For the changes I proposed, I'd do the work. I don't propose things unless
I'm willing and able to roll up my sleeves and do 'em ;)
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jim,
>>
>>>
>>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>>
>>> --with-epm
>>> --with-dmake
>>> --with-beanshell
>>
>> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate
>>
Hello Jim, all,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:22:51AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
> >> that some
Hello Jim,
I think I understand it nowe clear
Kine regards
Mechtilde
Am 09.12.20 um 16:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>
>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jim,
>>
>>>
>>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>>
>>> --with-epm
>>> --with-dmake
>>> --with-beanshell
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
>> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
>>
>> For example,
>>
>>
Hi Jim,
Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
>
> For example,
>
> --with-dmake-path
> --with-dmake-url
> --with-epm
> --with-epm-url
>
> Why does
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
>>
>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>
>> --with-epm
>> --with-dmake
>> --with-beanshell
>
> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate
> version like in ext_sources.
Can you provide an
Hello Jim,
Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
>
> For example,
>
> --with-dmake-path
> --with-dmake-url
> --with-epm
> --with-epm-url
>
> Why
Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
For example,
--with-dmake-path
--with-dmake-url
--with-epm
--with-epm-url
Why does dmake use dmake-path but EPM just use epm? Why 2 directives when they
could
