Hi Pavel;
I think we are walking on a thin ice with this Boost integration.
Boost seems to push some C++ compilers to the limits (specially
the older ones). Boost does have it's share of bugs, but a share of
the problems when using boost is actually caused by STLport.
I think I will be
On 01/05/2013 11:49 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:23:04AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Thanks to Herbet this was fixed !
The build is broken in shell now but it seems unrelated.
The build output must be cleaned in that module before building. It
seems
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:23:04AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Thanks to Herbet this was fixed !
The build is broken in shell now but it seems unrelated.
The build output must be cleaned in that module
Hi,
On 04.01.2013 06:19, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
As title says the windows build got broken by my attempt to use boost::math in
Calc. The linux buildbots are fine so it seems some interaction between MSVC
and boost.
hdu@ kindly provided a log:
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org
...
Hi,
On 04.01.2013 06:19, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
As title says the windows build got broken by my attempt to use boost::math
in Calc. The linux buildbots are fine so it seems some interaction between
MSVC
and
Hmm .. I found it,
MSVC is picky/dumb and we have to specify the type, like in this case:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/708555/compile-error-c-could-not-deduce-template-argument-for-t
If someone with Windows just goes ahead and fixes that, we can continue
enjoying great precision in our
