OK french user confirm that : https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176
is fixed with 4.1.4.
Good job!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
sted under
Windows 7 (=6.1.7601) Professional SP1 x64
I will install under Windows XP when I have a chance.
Pedro
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: dev@openoffice.apache.org
An:
Cc:
Gesendet:Mon, 3 Jul 2017 23:38:18 +0100
Betreff:Re: i have tested
Hi all
> The issue can be te
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 9:30 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: i have tested
>
> Hi Jörg, Hi Pedro!
> I uploaded a new test version on Sunday:The build environment was
> switched to Wind
-
Von: dev@openoffice.apache.org
An:
Cc:
Gesendet:Mon, 3 Jul 2017 23:38:18 +0100
Betreff:Re: i have tested
Hi all
> The issue can be tested with any version of Windows irregardless of
> bitness of the OS. The issue is with the version of msvcr100.dll.
The
> 64bit version of the dl
Hi all
The issue can be tested with any version of Windows irregardless of
bitness of the OS. The issue is with the version of msvcr100.dll. The
64bit version of the dll was inadvertently bundled with the 4.1.3
release thereby not allowing AOO version 4.1.3 to recognize a valid 32
bit JRE. To
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 12:26 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: i have tested
>
> > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
>
> > at least it works on my Windows 10 (64
hrieb FR web forum:
> > Is this: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176
> is fixed with 4.1.4?
> > I can't test cause I don't have Windows 32-bit.
I have tested 4.1.4 and Java 7 is shown under Extras-Settings-Java and can be
activated.
OS: Windows 7 (32 Bi
; - Mail original -
> De: "Jörg Schmidt" <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Juin 2017 21:32:16
> Objet: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)
>
> Hello,
>
>> I am just doing a build of AOO414 including
?id=127176 is fixed with 4.1.4?
> I can't test cause I don't have Windows 32-bit.
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Jörg Schmidt" <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Juin 2017 21:32:16
> Objet: i have tested (was: Test build
Is this: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176 is fixed with 4.1.4?
I can't test cause I don't have Windows 32-bit.
- Mail original -
De: "Jörg Schmidt" <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Juin 2017 21:32:16
Objet: i have t
Hmm, seems my fun LVL is low.
It is just an advert. It is fine if you like it your way. But I really really
recommend you take at least a look. Maybe it has some ideas for you. Since the
tool is only a PowerShell script.
And Windows install mechanics need some love... ;)
All the best
Peter
Am
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:peter.kov...@posteo.de]
> Windows98 is not a good reference in total.
> I would only compare it to the NT series. And all of them
> where stable depending what you install.
My statement was just a joke. Of course it is not right to compare Windows 98SE
directly
Windows98 is not a good reference in total.
I would only compare it to the NT series. And all of them where stable
depending what you install.
I would like to advertise Chocolatey, the Windows Paket Manager. It is really
the way to go if you want to do server based installations.
All the best
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> >> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-)
> >> http://www.7-zip.de/
> > OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything
> is fine now.
>
> 7-zip 9.20
Am 29.06.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>
>
>> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
>> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-)
>> http://www.7-zip.de/
> OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything is fine now.
7-zip 9.20 is almost 7 years old.
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-)
> http://www.7-zip.de/
OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything is fine now.
Jörg
-
To
Am 29.06.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
>> Why unpack it?
> because it is more convenient, if I want to make a server installation (setup
> /a) afterwards.
> I can do the extraction to the desired directory without having to
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Why unpack it?
because it is more convenient, if I want to make a server installation (setup
/a) afterwards.
I can do the extraction to the desired directory without having to choose,
because the right command is in the context
Am 29.06.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> Hello,
>
>> I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages.
> Thank you.
>
> I have tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Win_x86_install_de.exe, no problems.
That sounds good!
> But I have made a strange
Hello,
> I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages.
Thank you.
I have tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Win_x86_install_de.exe, no problems.
But I have made a strange observation:
If I try to unpack the installation package with 7Zip does not w
20 matches
Mail list logo
