Re: "isn't comprised of"

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:07:25 -0500 > > "E. Ward" wrote: > > > >> Dear Brilliant OOers, > >> > >> About comprise. > >> > >> You write, "is comprised of six personal productivity application

Re: "isn't comprised of"

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Hi, > > Rob Weir wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:07:25 -0500 > >> "E. Ward" wrote: > >> > >>> Dear Brilliant OOers, > >>> > >>> About comprise. > >>> > >>> You write, "is comp

Re: "isn't comprised of"

Hi, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:07:25 -0500 >> "E. Ward" wrote: >> >>> Dear Brilliant OOers, >>> >>> About comprise. >>> >>> You write, "is comprised of six personal productivity applications" >>> >>> Actually, it's, "six perso

Re: "isn't comprised of"

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:07:25 -0500 > "E. Ward" wrote: > >> Dear Brilliant OOers, >> >> About comprise. >> >> You write, "is comprised of six personal productivity applications" >> >> Actually, it's, "six personal productivity application comp

Re: "isn't comprised of"

On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:07:25 -0500 "E. Ward" wrote: > Dear Brilliant OOers, > > About comprise. > > You write, "is comprised of six personal productivity applications" > > Actually, it's, "six personal productivity application comprise OO." > > That is, the smaller comprise the larger. Ever

"isn't comprised of"

Dear Brilliant OOers, About comprise. You write, "is comprised of six personal productivity applications" Actually, it's, "six personal productivity application comprise OO." That is, the smaller comprise the larger. Everyone get it wrong - all the time . . . except . . . I'm about to try