On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 21.11.2012 17:17, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
>> to suggest that that's as good a time as any
>>
>> to adjust the location of your svn tree to
>> top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
>>
On 21.11.2012 17:17, Joe Schaefer wrote:
With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
to suggest that that's as good a time as any
to adjust the location of your svn tree to
top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
set the old location read-only,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
> to suggest that that's as good a time as any
>
> to adjust the location of your svn tree to
> top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
> of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
> set the
Dave Fisher wrote on Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:35:39 -0800:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
> > to suggest that that's as good a time as any
> >
> > to adjust the location of your svn tree to
> > top-lev
Hi Joe,
Thanks!
On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
> to suggest that that's as good a time as any
>
> to adjust the location of your svn tree to
> top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
> of the tree, I plan to copy it instead
With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
to suggest that that's as good a time as any
to adjust the location of your svn tree to
top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
set the old location read-only, given that
past source releases still depen
