Re: [dev] OO2 130 and OfficeBean

2005-09-29 Thread Joachim Lingner
I try SimpleBootstrap_java.java (and another exampel form OfficeDev) and it work fine with both (kde and gtk).How I can add open OO frame to my Java panel (frame) ? As I mentioned before, OOoBean needed a way to receive the component context to fully support this example. This is not yet

[dev] OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Candidate

2005-09-29 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
All, OpenOffice.org 2.0 has gone from being a Beta to a Release Candidate (RC). Congratulations to all who made this possible! As an RC, OpenOffice.org 2.0 RC still--even more so--needs to be downloaded and tested by the community. So we urge you to go to http://

Re: [dev] OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Candidate

2005-09-29 Thread Rich
which dev build does this rc correspond to ? Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: All, OpenOffice.org 2.0 has gone from being a Beta to a Release Candidate .. -- Rich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

[dev] How to transfer Macros (OO 2.0 BETA2)

2005-09-29 Thread Alexander Peters
Hello! I want to transfer some Makros from a Writer Dokument to a new Lib. I use a Install-Script (start with a button in the document) which creates a new Lib and copys the Macos into the new lib. That works fine. Now i try to open the document by OLE and then start the Install-Macro by

Re: [dev] OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Candidate

2005-09-29 Thread David Fraser
And why doesn't there seem to be a source tarball? I tried even looking on the primary mirrors ... anyone know? Rich wrote: which dev build does this rc correspond to ? Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: All, OpenOffice.org 2.0 has gone from being a Beta to a Release Candidate ..

Re: [dev] OO2 130 and OfficeBean

2005-09-29 Thread snpe
Joachim, As I mentioned before, OOoBean needed a way to receive the component context to fully support this example. This is not yet implemented. But I may work nonetheless, because now the application and the bean will be loaded with a special classloader that knows the location of the jar

Re: [dev] OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Candidate

2005-09-29 Thread cono
David Fraser wrote: And why doesn't there seem to be a source tarball? I tried even looking on the primary mirrors ... anyone know? Rich wrote: which dev build does this rc correspond to ? RC1 is 1.9.130. Greetings, Cor Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: All, OpenOffice.org 2.0 has gone