[dev] Build error in my build system with OOE680_m6

2006-12-14 Thread KAMI
Hi! I wanted to build OOo 2.1 m6 on Linux (Sid) 4.0 base system. This is a newly set up of build system, so It can be a version or package error... I have got error message, the consol output is attached to this letter. Can someon help out the idea of possible problems? Thanks, KAMI

Re: [dev] Build error in my build system with OOE680_m6

2006-12-14 Thread Pavel Janík
Hi, /ooo2/nas/unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/nas-1.6/lib/audio/ConnSvr.c:1981: undefined reference to `XauDisposeAuth' /ooo2/nas/unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/nas-1.6/lib/audio/ConnSvr.c:1832: undefined reference to `XauGetBestAuthByAddr' please enter on or the other string in quotes into IssueZilla

Re: [dev] Where to find pam.doc?

2006-12-14 Thread Frank Meies
Hi Matthias, Hi Matthias, On 12/14/06 11:17, Matthias B. wrote: The file ooo_OOE680_m6_src/sw/source/core/crsr/pam.cxx contains the following comment /* 417 |* 418 |* SwPointAndMark 419 |* 420 |*

Re: [dev] Build error in my build system with OOE680_m6

2006-12-14 Thread KAMI
Hello Indraveni! Thank you for the detailed information. I will try your tipp ASAP, and I will send back infromation about solution. Best regards, KAMI Indraveni írta: HI, This is a common error. You can see the issue 64134. You can find it here

Re: [dev] First release of the PengYou project

2006-12-14 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi Jérémy, I testes the whole system and really looks promising (I'd like to include the whole in our SWT-Application). Might I suggest that you set up a mailing list to ask questions. I saw the webform at your the homepage but a mailing list or newsgroup would be a really great thing to ask

Re: [dev] Bad PRJNAMEs

2006-12-14 Thread Nikolai Pretzell
Stephan Bergmann schrieb: Attached are two quick and dirty scripts that worked for me (within Hamburg build environment on a Linux box) to find all the places where PRJNAME is probably set wrongly (see below). Feel free to fix those you feel responsible for.

Re: [dev] In the Works: New OOo C++ Coding Standards

2006-12-14 Thread Niklas Nebel
Thorsten Behrens wrote: You've hit the point exactly. There are some rules that require consistency and easy discernibility of local and member variables, and that's about all that needs to be said about that. Whether a member starts with m_ or with ma is largely irrelevant - as long as it is

Re: [dev] base

2006-12-14 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Glen Hinckley wrote: I was looking to work on base. I would like to do forms and reports. Not a lot to go on for the question... Perhaps this will get you started: http://www.pitonyak.org/database/AndrewBase.odt -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt

Re: Re: [dev] First release of the PengYou project

2006-12-14 Thread Jérémy Bethmont
Hello Tom, On 12/14/06, Tom Schindl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jérémy, I testes the whole system and really looks promising (I'd like to include the whole in our SWT-Application). Might I suggest that you set up a mailing list to ask questions. I saw the webform at your the homepage but a

Re: [dev] In the Works: New OOo C++ Coding Standards

2006-12-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Niklas, you wrote: Historically, modules also differ on a lot of other subjects. That's why we need these guidelines in the first place. Granted - but in my book, at least something like maName vs. m_aName needn't be standardized, just because we're standardizing on other stuff. A little

Re: [dev] In the Works: New OOo C++ Coding Standards

2006-12-14 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germa ny
Hi Thorsten, A little bit of naming convention is certainly needed. Nobody wants to see a mixture of Foo aFoo(maFoo); CFoo foo(_foo); foo f_(f); even if it's in different modules. OK - so, what naming scheme would you propose? *gulp* No, please let's not start this. Chances for any