Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

Hi Malte, Malte Timmermann wrote: IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply listeners and we don't need the parameter. That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)? But I am not sure - you are the expert ;) So if a

[dev] Any reason we include libdb_java42.[dll|so] in installsets ?

Do we need db.jar and libdb_java42.[dll|so] anymore ? As far as I can see they are not necessary at build-time anymore, but we currently include libdb_java via gid_File_Lib_Dbjava in scp2 into our installsets. Is there any reason for this, i.e. anything I'm unaware of that makes use of it ? I'd

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

Andreas... Andreas Martens wrote: Hi Malte, Malte Timmermann wrote: IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply listeners and we don't need the parameter. That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)? But I am not

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

Hi Malte, Malte Timmermann wrote: Andreas... Andreas Martens wrote: Hi Malte, Malte Timmermann wrote: IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply listeners and we don't need the parameter. That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in

[dev] SfxObjectShell::Set/GetWorkingDocument, and how to get rid of it

Hi, in the course of UNOizing the Basic IDE (so it will finally be able to work on documents which are not implemented using the SfxObjectShell), I stumbled upon SfxObjectShell::Set/GetWorkingDocument. As I understand it, the WorkingDocument is a dedicated document (SfxObjectShell, that is),