[dev] Problems with OOo web pages

2008-10-10 Thread norseman
To whomever this concerns: Would someone be kind enough to bundle up the OpenOffice.org Developer's Guide for OOo 2.?.?... and send me a ftp or whatever location to download it? The .tgz would be the preferred bundle format. Requiring single page at a time downloads is !#%%$#!* (not good).

[dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Helge Delfs
Hi Thorsten, Issues for automated tests are from now on handled the same way like all other issues and if an autotest breaks in a CWS it is a must to fix it within this CWS with the same policies. CWS must be set to 'new' then and after fixing again to 'ready for QA'. Currently you don't have to

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: However you might run these tests by yourself and it is of course acceptable to fix these tests if required. What's the (hopefully one line) way to run these tests myself ? Or is this a work in progress and not for use right now ? C.

Re: [dev] Error while calling web service through openoffice extention

2008-10-10 Thread Dinesh Chothe
Hello, What are the things I need to do it working with OpenOffice2.3? On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Dinesh Chothe [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hello All,Firstly I apologize for making mistake in writing Exception error i.e. (Exception =

Re: [dev] Error while calling web service through openoffice extention

2008-10-10 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/10/08 14:25, Dinesh Chothe wrote: Hello, What are the things I need to do it working with OpenOffice2.3? Wrap java.lang.ClassLoader old = java.lang.Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader( this.getClass().getClassLoader()); try { ... } finally {

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi Caolán, Caolán McNamara schrieb: On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: However you might run these tests by yourself and it is of course acceptable to fix these tests if required. What's the (hopefully one line) way to run these tests myself ? Or is this a work in

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi, Martin Hollmichel schrieb: Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: However you might run these tests by yourself and it is of course acceptable to fix these tests if required. What's the (hopefully one line) way to run these tests myself ? Or

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Helge Delfs
Hi Caolán, Am 10.10.08 10:36, Caolán McNamara schrieb: On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: However you might run these tests by yourself and it is of course acceptable to fix these tests if required. What's the (hopefully one line) way to run these tests myself ? Or is

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:39:46PM +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: Am 10.10.08 10:36, Caolán McNamara schrieb: On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: However you might run these tests by yourself and it is of course acceptable to fix these tests if required. What's the

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/10/08 15:02, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Here are some misunderstandings. QA isn't QA in software testing. The developer talked often about code quality and he needs tools to run, to check if his code break anything. The GUI testing with VCL TestTool isn't such a tooling. The VCL TestTool check

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Thorsten, I know that developers want to start it from the command line. Well, developers want a way to easily judge the quality of their work. I don't care whether testtool can be run from command line, it's just the environment I'm used to ... If you give us a possiblity to run testtool

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann schrieb: On 10/10/08 15:02, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Here are some misunderstandings. QA isn't QA in software testing. The developer talked often about code quality and he needs tools to run, to check if his code break anything. The GUI testing with VCL TestTool

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi, I invite all of you to my presentation at the OOoCon2008 in Bejing (Thursday at 9:00 as I remember). There I will talk about this vision and possibilities. And I will talk also about the general Software QA which is a complex scenario. There we can talk about concerns and requirements by

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Martin Hollmichel
Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Helge Delfs wrote: However you might run these tests by yourself and it is of course acceptable to fix these tests if required. What's the (hopefully one line) way to run these tests myself ? Or is this a work in progress and

[dev] OOo rc4

2008-10-10 Thread Per Eriksson
Hej, OOo rc4 har nu godkänts av release-gruppen. Eftersom vi inte hittat några buggar i rc4 kommer jag att godkänna den i QATrack idag. Vi beräknar att den bör komma upp på måndag eller tisdag, då jag publicerar den på hemsidan. Trevlig helg, Mvh Per

Re: [dev] Re: testautomation the effects on the CWS process

2008-10-10 Thread Mathias Bauer
Thorsten Behrens wrote: May I suggest a moratorium on enforcing this (at least for community) CWS then, until this is finished? I think Helge's blog posting is kind of a abridged edition. The change he is talking about is not related to bugs that break the tests - in that case you had to fix