[dev] disabling module xmlsecurity when not building module nss

2009-11-26 Thread Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg
Hi all, Building of module nss (current version is 3.12.4) can be prevented using the configure option --disable-nss-module. In that case the older nss libraries (v. 3.11.9) from module moz are used, unless building moz was also disabled. In case of the latter, the xmlsecurity module is not

Re: [dev] disabling module xmlsecurity when not building module nss

2009-11-26 Thread Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg
Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: As a consequence I will disable building of xmlsecurity when building of the nss module is disabled. Please do not forget system-nss (aka system-mozilla

[dev] Changed build requirements for Windows

2009-08-27 Thread Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg
Hi, as of probably DEV300m57, it is necessary to have the Mozilla build tools (Windows only) installed. This is necessary to build the new nss module. Building of this module can be switched off by --disable-nss-module. See also

Re: [dev] External Properties in oxt

2009-08-18 Thread Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg
No. However you could use the configuration. That is, a new extension installes a xcu containing the new data, which is then used by the first extension. But I think this will just complicate matters and it is probably best to ship a new version of your extension containing the modified data.

Re: [dev] About OOo digital signature OOoConf 2008.

2009-03-23 Thread Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg
Hi, I wrote a page at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Improving_The_Digital_Signature_Feature where I put together my view of how the signature framework could work. It is not clear when this is to be implemented and who would take of it. Joachim Giuseppe Castagno wrote: Hi all,