Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 23:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
But the Exit method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
do so. The only known problem this creates is that it
Hi Mathias, Caolan,
IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
also avoid the problems we are every once a while facing regarding
shutdown ...
Kay
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Caolán
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Mathias, Caolan,
IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
also avoid the problems we are every once a while facing regarding
shutdown ...
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Mathias, Caolan,
IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
also avoid the problems we are every once a while
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Mathias, Caolan,
IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
also
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Not linked against - it's different. As an example, many Writer code
will fail if the desktop service or some others have been destroyed
already. Where's the guarantee that the desktop will still exist when
the Writer dll gets unloaded? When will it be unloaded
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
But the Exit method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
do so. The only known problem this creates is that it prevents the
detection of memory leaks caused by the objects that now never get
deleted.
Possibly still the
Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
But the Exit method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
do so. The only known problem this creates is that it prevents the
detection of memory leaks caused by the objects that now never get
deleted.
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 23:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
But the Exit method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
do so. The only known problem this creates is that it prevents the
detection of
So all those ScDLL::Exit, and SmDLL::Exit etc. Where/When are they
supposed to be called ? Did they ever get called sometime in the past ?
C.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo
