Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Ok, I will remove the references from to gpc from the Building Guide for
current
releases. However, the directory external/gpc needs to be removed and
configure
needs to get rid of related options. Is there a bug for this already or do I
need to open a new one?
Thorsten Behrens thb at openoffice.org writes:
all distros I know of are using the non-gpc clipper since ages, I'm
not aware of any regressions there. Also, if my memory does not fail
me, Hamburg switched to non-gpc for 3.0, at least I don't find any
traces of WITH_GPC in solenv anymore.
Ok,
Terrence Miller wrote:
If OOo wants to be able to reproduce builds, we will need to have a
local snapshot of any package
listed as a build requirement.
The idea is that QA person should be be able to take a blank machine, a
Linux install CD,
and a CD containning a milestone and after
Terrence Miller terrencem at sbcglobal.net writes:
I am about half way through my first build
Hi Terrence,
thank you for taking the time to report back.
and have already run into things
which could lead to unstable Linux builds: My experience has convinced
me that
any source information
Terrence Miller terrencem at sbcglobal.net writes:
In current scheme you end up running configure once for each missing
package (since it stops on first error). Sometimes
the error message is useful but not always.
I understand the problem, but unfortunately maintaining an up-to-date complete
