Re: [dev] A pipe dream?

2007-09-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Hennes Rohling wrote: Please remove 2.1 from protocol definition. The behaviour of officeloader.cxx in conjunction with the perftune.ini was designed only for a well defined reduced scenario not to fullfill the complete protocol. It is subject to change. The idea behind it is to fullfill the

Re: [dev] A pipe dream?

2007-09-23 Thread Hennes Rohling
Please remove 2.1 from protocol definition. The behaviour of officeloader.cxx in conjunction with the perftune.ini was designed only for a well defined reduced scenario not to fullfill the complete protocol. It is subject to change. The idea behind it is to fullfill the basic protocol by just

[dev] A pipe dream?

2007-09-05 Thread Stephan Bergmann
For certain reasons, when a single user requests multiple instances of the same soffice process to run in parallel, this is instead handled internally by only one instance running and all other instances passing their command lines over a pipe to that one instance, and then terminating again.