Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
IMHO the only reason that 1.3.1 still is the baseline is that nobody
took care of raising it. And by now nobody has raised any objections
Well, both is not true.
Please go back to the beginning of this thread.
???
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
IMHO the only reason that 1.3.1 still is the baseline is that nobody
took care of raising it. And by now nobody has raised any objections
Well, both is not true.
Please go back to the beginning of this thread.
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) -
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Rony,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement originally
were on that alias.
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Rony,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement
From: Rony G. Flatscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:16
To: dev@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Java 1.5 now minimal requirement ? (Re: [dev] RFC:
java
1.5
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Rony,
I did start
Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Rony,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement
Hi Rony,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement originally
were on that alias.
Regards
Kay
Rony G.
Hi Kay,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement originally
were on that alias.
Thank you very much for this clarification!
Rony,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Kay,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement originally
were on that alias.
Thank you
Hi Kay,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK,
baseline etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement
originally were on that alias.
Thank you very much for this clarification!
Hi there,
just noticed that running DEV300/m23 with Java 1.4 does not work anymore:
- cut here -
E:\rony\dev\bsf\src\bintestOOo.rex
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
com/sun/star/comp/helper/Bootstrap (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
11 matches
Mail list logo
