Re: [dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional?

Hi stephan, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : [Laurent's response mail somehow got lost for me, so I respond via cut/paste from the archives.] "will old .zip packages stil be deployabale with unopkg (i think so) ?" Yes, of course; this does not affect unopkg. "I suggest writting a message telling

Re: [dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional?

unopkg explicitelly, ..." pkgchk already does that (for quite some time now). -Stephan Original Message Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:58:31 +0100 From: Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: [dev] Making deprecated pkg

Re: [dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional?

Hi stephan pkgchk is a deprecated command line tool bundled with OOo (at least deprecated since OOo 2.0, and clearly saying so on every invocation) for which unopkg is the functionally superior replacement (available for a long time now, even before OOo 2.0). will old .zip packages stil be

[dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional?

Implementing (unique extension identifiers; implying that different extensions can have identical file names), I have some difficulties to modify pkgchk accordingly. pkgchk is a deprecated command line tool bundled with OOo (at least de