Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Janne Johansson
2006/6/26, Éric Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le Lundi 26 Juin 2006 15:47, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg a écrit: - OOo should not attempt to build its own packages, at least under Linux. Under Linux, that's the distributions' work! This problem is related to the make install one.

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg
Janne, Janne Johansson wrote: If not for those reasons, then for the reason that zillions of other opensource products happen to have a unpack ; configure ; make ; make install routine well built in into the spines of us builders. In general, it shouldn't be to hard to support the classic

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: 1) I think it just makes the life of OOo package maintainers in the Linux distributions much harder. I suppose that they basically rpm-install the OOo packages, and then repackage them. Or some might

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg
Hi Rene, Rene Engelhard wrote: ROTL. Not everything the LSB says makes sense. The OOo build system *has* support for building debs. Use this. This unfortunately does not work for people not building their own OOo. A while ago it was planned (-Martin H.: any news on this?) to provide .debs

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Dienstag, 27. Juni 2006 13:26 schrieb Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg: That's the distributions' issue. EXACTLY No. It's not. You mean that it's a problem for *you*. I mean outdated packages in a distribution is _at first_ a problem of that *distri itself*. That real outdated packaegs in

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jane, On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote: 2006/6/26, Éric Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le Lundi 26 Juin 2006 15:47, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg a écrit: - OOo should not attempt to build its own packages, at least under Linux. Under Linux, that's

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-27 Thread Janne Johansson
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote: 2006/6/26, Éric Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le Lundi 26 Juin 2006 15:47, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg a écrit: - OOo should not attempt to build its own packages, at least under Linux. Under Linux, that's the

[dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-26 Thread Éric Bischoff
Le Lundi 26 Juin 2006 15:47, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg a écrit : - OOo should not attempt to build its own packages, at least under Linux. Under Linux, that's the distributions' work! This problem is related to the make install one. In my opinion, OOo is showing the right

Re: [dev] Packaging process (Was: Re: [dev] Survey - OpenOffice.org Developer Feedback Needed)

2006-06-26 Thread Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg
Éric Bischoff wrote: Le Lundi 26 Juin 2006 15:47, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg a écrit : - OOo should not attempt to build its own packages, at least under Linux. Under Linux, that's the distributions' work! This problem is related to the make install one. In my opinion, OOo is