hi!
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 01/23/09 16:10, Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:
with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will reside in
its own patch. for the local module makefiles, the only visible change
is PATCH_FILE_NAME -> PATCH_FILES. this variable now hold the list (and
app
On 01/23/09 16:10, Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:
with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will reside in
its own patch. for the local module makefiles, the only visible change
is PATCH_FILE_NAME -> PATCH_FILES. this variable now hold the list (and
apply prder) of the existing pat
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 21:10 +0100, Pavel Janík wrote:
> Do we need to define some naming scheme for patches or should we keep
> the work of generating correct/random names to patchers?
I'd suggest a scheme that includes the upstream bugtracker id that the
patch was submitted upstream under, or t
Hi,
On 23.1.2009, at 16:10, Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:
with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will
reside in
its own patch. for the local module makefiles, the only visible
change
is PATCH_FILE_NAME -> PATCH_FILES. this variable now hold the list
(and
apply prder) of
Hi Ause,
> in the current scenario, there is only one active patch per source
> tarball which has to contain all required changes for the build. as
> discussed in issue 40246, this may lead to duplication and hard to
> maintain patches.
>
> with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change no
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 16:10 +0100, Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:
> hi!
> with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will reside in
> its own patch. for the local module makefiles, the only visible change
> is PATCH_FILE_NAME -> PATCH_FILES. this variable now hold the list (and
> app
hi!
in the current scenario, there is only one active patch per source
tarball which has to contain all required changes for the build. as
discussed in issue 40246, this may lead to duplication and hard to
maintain patches.
with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will reside in
