Hi,
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Heiko L. wrote:
|diff --git a/sc/inc/sc.hrc b/sc/inc/sc.hrc
- pwd != patchdir
- use -p1
Nonsense. If you looked at the actual patch:
--- sc/inc/sc.hrc
+++ sc/inc/sc.hrc
Go figure.
(The sbuild tree of theones who tries building is just fucked
Thanks guys. I just reinstalled my system and tried to download OO again,
because there were lots of files missing and it just couldn't work. I
installed Ubuntu Karmic but it's not working there either,
ubuntu-sparc-hack.diff seems like missing second half of a file. I was
hopeless so I commented
Hi Michal,
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:03 +0200, Michal Spisiak wrote:
Thanks guys. I just reinstalled my system and tried to download OO again,
because there were lots of files missing and it just couldn't work. I
installed Ubuntu Karmic but it's not working there either,
ubuntu-sparc-hack.diff
Hi List,
the Wiki Cleanup has been almost completed. There are just seven pages
left in:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Special:UncategorizedPages
If you can remove those, please do so. Also note the new Guidelines at:
Emilia,
Please feel free to join the Slovak community here:
http://sk.openoffice.org/
Regards,
Charles-H. Schulz
Le Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:07:22 +0100,
Emília Alezárová alezarova.emi...@atk.sk a écrit :
Good day
I would like to help you produced OpenOffice.org 3.2 In my opinion,
it would be
On 03/26/10 18:42, Terrence Enger wrote:
However, I have not found what library holds the object code for
operators_new_delete.cxx. So it is hard to set a breakpoint to see
what heap address is causing the assertion. (When a system library is
calling delete or delete[], it is hard to work back
Hi Terrence,
On Friday, 2010-03-26 13:42:28 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
However, I have not found what library holds the object code for
operators_new_delete.cxx.
Let's see.. operators_new_delete.cxx is in sal/cpprt/, the
sal/cpprt/makefile.mk says TARGET=salcpprt, then for $(OS) !=
SOLARIS
Hi Martin, *,
this is in response to your blog post here:
http://blogs.sun.com/ratte/entry/openoffice_org_product_development
(I'll separately post a blog entry about this, but would prefer
discussion on this mailing list)
You wrote:
The only candidate now for the non-code contributing
Hi Thorsten, all,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Martin, *,
this is in response to your blog post here:
http://blogs.sun.com/ratte/entry/openoffice_org_product_development
(I'll separately post a blog entry about this, but would prefer
discussion on this mailing list)
You wrote:
The only
I am trying to build OOO320_m14 on Windows in CygWin 1.5.25
Here is my configure:
./configure \
--disable-nss-module \
--with-use-shell=bash \
--disable-activex \
--disable-directx \
--disable-epm \
--disable-atl \
--disable-build-mozilla \
--with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program
Mathias Bauer wrote (26-03-10 13:50)
There could be another option that came up when I discussed the problem
with Carsten Driesner: what if we could bundle the three controls into
a common parent window (transparent and with no borders so that the sub
[...]
I've an idea in a completely
Good day
When will the new OpenOffice 3.2?
Hi Thorsten, all,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Martin, *,
this is in response to your blog post here:
http://blogs.sun.com/ratte/entry/openoffice_org_product_development
(I'll separately post a blog entry about this, but would prefer
discussion on this mailing list)
You wrote:
The only
Hey Thorsten,
I've just read your blog post and thought that I follow your advice and
join the discussion here.
You know that we've had a couple of discussions regarding OpenOffice.org
as a product and the role of QA and UX in the whole process. And we did
not agree on many things in these
14 matches
Mail list logo
