Re: [dev] Re: operator delete mismatch
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 21:19 +0200, Björn Michaelsen wrote: Am Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:12:00 -0400 schrieb Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com: Is there anything that will capture a record of what I did to get into an interesting situation? It has happened more than once that I have been trying to reproduced an assertion--but writing down the steps as I go along, so as to produce a good bug report--when I fat-finger something (but I am not sure exactly what) which sends me to a different assertion. This: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Experience/OpenOffice.org_User_Feedback_Program could be of some help to figure out what you fat-fingered. ;) However, I fear it is still a bit to high-level to be useful in general. But it might give you a hint on what just happened in some situations. I have never seen the help optimize the quality ... window presented, and my Tools Options OpenOffice.org lacks category Improvement Program. Output from configure --help does not contain the string improve. Is there something else I need to do to get this? I suspect the the testautomation project has something that would help me. However, I am already feeling overwhelmed by new knowledge. Actually, I find many things that tend to spread out my attention: new assertions, new techniques, new (to me) parts of OO. But I think that I will only be able to contribute usefully if I can get deeper instead of wider, if you know what I mean. I am in need of general guidance. Cheers, Terry. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] operator delete mismatch
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 13:51 +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Terrence, A website page about building OOo says that non-product builds are used almost exclusively within Sun. For a long time, I incorrectly took that to be a warning that they are hard to accomplish rather than merely a description of a regrettable state of affairs. Perhaps we do not want to encourage a non-product build for a newcomer's very first attempt, but I could have been finding these assertions long ago. Would a change to the website be in order? Certainly, go ahead. ( I searched, and I couldn't find the page. Then I was doing something else, and I stumbled across it. Obviously I need to improve my google skills. ) For anybody who cares, I changed Non Product Build http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Non_Product_Build; the diff is http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Non_Product_Buildcurid=1669diff=163692oldid=160306. Cheers, Terry. Ciao Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: operator delete mismatch
Am Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:24:49 -0400 schrieb Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com: On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 21:19 +0200, Björn Michaelsen wrote: Am Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:12:00 -0400 schrieb Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com: Is there anything that will capture a record of what I did to get into an interesting situation? It has happened more than once that I have been trying to reproduced an assertion--but writing down the steps as I go along, so as to produce a good bug report--when I fat-finger something (but I am not sure exactly what) which sends me to a different assertion. This: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Experience/OpenOffice.org_User_Feedback_Program could be of some help to figure out what you fat-fingered. ;) However, I fear it is still a bit to high-level to be useful in general. But it might give you a hint on what just happened in some situations. I have never seen the help optimize the quality ... window presented, and my Tools Options OpenOffice.org lacks category Improvement Program. Output from configure --help does not contain the string improve. Is there something else I need to do to get this? Oh, I am so sorry. Yes, there is something that needs to be done to activate it. The feedback program is only activated in official sun builds. Only there there are the files: ./basis3.2/share/registry/modules/org/openoffice/Office/Jobs/Jobs-oooimprovement.xcu ./basis3.2/share/registry/modules/org/openoffice/Office/Logging/Logging-oooimprovement.xcu in the installation. In the source tree you will find the files at: ./extensions/source/oooimprovement/Jobs.xcu ./extensions/source/oooimprovement/Logging.xcu Im sorry, if I caused confusion. Actually, I find many things that tend to spread out my attention: new assertions, new techniques, new (to me) parts of OO. But I think that I will only be able to contribute usefully if I can get deeper instead of wider, if you know what I mean. I am in need of general guidance. Yes, OOo is huge and assertions take you all over the place. It might be useful to just concentrate on set of modules (from one application) and ignore everything else in the beginning. And even then it helps to limit oneself to the lowhanging fruits for starters. BR, Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
