Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
i'm no dev, but +1 :) Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote: Pavel Janík, 17-01-2007 18:31: Hi, ... renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org ... What about the #users.openoffice.org? #openoffice.org would be for general talking (including to support users) and we would still having a #users.openoffice.org or it would be dropped? currently, the users channel is surprisingly inactive. scattering users even more would not be good - maybe if in the future it gets overcrowded, a split could happen. also, as ain mentioned, a pretty large percentage of questions are above average difficulty level, and, in my opinion, too many of them stay unanswered. ... -- Rich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? Please vote in this thread. The deadline (me as a benevolent dictator decided ;-) is this Friday, 23:59:59 UTC. +1 from me Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Pavel Janík [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org +1 Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd
Hello Masters! It seems the problem was with memory size. I run my Windows/Cygwin in a virtual machine. I increased the memory size to over 600MB (from 512 MB) and it is now compiling... Thanks, KAMI PS: I think a dedicated machine would be the best for this task :o) KAMI írta: Hello! I tried to compile OOo 2.1 under Windows/Cygwin, but somehow liwpd has error. Here is my log: = Building project libwpd = /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd mkout -- version: 1.7 dmake: Executing shell macro: +$(WRAPCMD) echo $(subst,$/stl, $(SOLARINC)) - if ( -e ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6 ) mv ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6 ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6_removeme rm -rf ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6_removeme mkdir: cannot create directory `./wntmsci10.pro/misc/': File exists dmake: Executing shell macro: +$(TYPE) $(PRJ)$/$(ROUT)$/misc$/$(TARFILE_NAME).unpack cd ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build ( gunzip -c ../../../download/libwpd-0.8.6.tar.gz | tar -xvf -) /usr/bin/touch.exe so_unpacked_wpd libwpd-0.8.6/ [...] libwpd-0.8.6/docs/doxygen/header.html.in make writeable... cd ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build cat ../../../libwpd-0.8.6.diff | tr -d \015 | patch -b -p2 /usr/bin/touch.exe so_patched_wpd patching file libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib/makefile.mk patching file libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib/WP3VariableLengthGroup.cpp /usr/bin/touch.exe ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/so_configured_wpd mkdir ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib mkdir: cannot create directory `./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib': File exists cd ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib dmake /usr/bin/touch.exe /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd/./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/so_built_wpd dmake: Error code 5, while making '../../../../../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/s_WP3UnsupportedFixedLengthGroup.dpcc' dmake: '../../../../../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/s_WP3UnsupportedFixedLengthGroup.dpcc' removed. ---* TARGET.MK *--- dmake: Error code 255, while making './wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/so_built_wpd' ---* tg_merge.mk *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd Can you help me? KAMI - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Hi Pavel So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? +1 but be carefull not building an ivory tower (disconnect from the basis) Laurent -- Laurent Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org - http://www.indesko.com Nuxeo Enterprise Content Management http://www.nuxeo.com - http://www.nuxeo.org Livre Programmation OpenOffice.org, Eyrolles 2004-2006 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? Please vote in this thread. The deadline (me as a benevolent dictator decided ;-) is this Friday, 23:59:59 UTC. +1 Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? Please vote in this thread. The deadline (me as a benevolent dictator decided ;-) is this Friday, 23:59:59 UTC. +1 Carsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Hi Pavel, On Wednesday, 2007-01-17 22:31:06 +0100, Pavel Janík wrote: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org +1 Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Hi Caio, On Wednesday, 2007-01-17 20:36:46 -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote: This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. What about the #users.openoffice.org? #openoffice.org would be for general talking (including to support users) and we would still having a #users.openoffice.org or it would be dropped? I suggest to move #users.openoffice.org to #openoffice.org afterwards, making it the default anything goes channel. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Hi Pavel, Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. +1 for #dev.openoffice.org And +1 for renaming #go-oo to #dev.openoffice.org as well ;-) just my 6cts (the taxes were increased in Germany) -Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] How to reduce the barieres to contribute to OOo? Some suggestions and proposals from inside Sun ....
Hi, Nils Fuhrmann schrieb: ... Beside these three things were we like to initiate a change, there are currently things in progress which we like support more actively to bring down some restriction and hurdles we have. For CWSs, we typically like to see at least two installation sets on different platforms before integration. As this is a major issue for some contributors, we will support this by offering Build Bots for this purpose. We already have added a Solaris Build Bot (thanks to Thorsten Behrens) and will start to provide corresponding builds ASAP. In addition to the above mentioned Build Bot for Solaris Sparc, Ause has now setup and added a Build Bot for Solaris Intel. Regards, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] proposal for problematic UNC file url's
Entered as http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73625 -Background- In Windows, a UNC path to a directory looks like this (see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311079): \\server\share\path According to the file URI spec, Windows UNC paths should be accepted as file urls if they are entered like this: file:///server/share/path See http://udk.openoffice.org/cpp/man/spec/uris.html, last section, Hosts; Note however there is a typo in the spec--it says file://somewhere/somedir/file.txt but should say file:///somewhere/somedir/file.txt, with 3 slashes after the file:. UNC's paths however have long been problematic in OOo. See: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=196522 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9018 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13148 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51026 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53184 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56868 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72031 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72864 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73620 Part of the problem would seem to be that in OOo's implementation of file URL's, it cannot be unambiguously determined if the first component of the URL refers to a server or to a directory. For example, in file:///part1/part2/part3 part1 could refer to the directory /part1 on the local files system, or it could refer to the server part1 on the local network. -The Proposal- The submitter proposes that OOo's implementation of UNC file URL's be modified so it can be unambiguously determined if the first part of the path is a local directory or a network server. There are a multitude of syntaxes that could be used. For example: file:///server:share/path file:///server:/share/path file:///server//share/path file:///server/share:path file:///server:share:path file:///server:share:/path file:///server/share:/path What should not be used however, is the current ambiguous implementation file:///server/share/path The author of this proposal has no preference for syntax. Note however that Microsoft's document http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311079 discusses how Netware shares are parsed, and this may enter into the decision. Linux, Solaris and Samba considerations may also enter into the decision. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] proposal for problematic UNC file url's
Allen Pulsifer wrote: Entered as http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73625 Please see my response there. -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] proposal for problematic UNC file url's
Hello Stephan, Thank you for your reply. To answer your question, I thought it was a typo for several reasons: 1. In researching http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73620, I tried four possible syntaxes, file:/, file://, file:///, file: and none of them worked. 2. I found other instances on the OOo website and documentation that list the syntax as file:///. 3. Shoddy and incorrect documentation abound in the OOo project, so this was a reasonable conclusion. In summary, this was not an assumption, it was a conclusion reached based on experience, research and a diligent effort to solve the problem before putting in a bug report. If you are saying that a UNC path is distinguished by having only two slashes after the file:, rather than three slashes, then you are right, it is not ambiguous. I am still glad I raised the issue however, since (a) this needs to be better documented; and (b) based on how well UNC paths do not work in OOo, there seems to be just as much confusion among the developers as the users. Thank you again for your response. Allen -Original Message- From: Stephan Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:27 AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] proposal for problematic UNC file url's Allen Pulsifer wrote: Entered as http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73625 Please see my response there. -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Pavel Janík schrieb: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? +1 - Kai - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
+1 On 1/18/07, Kai Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pavel Janík schrieb: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? +1 - Kai - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
