Does anyone know about this exception?
(com::sun::star::lang::WrappedTargetRuntimeException)
2010/1/27 K S pgmb...@gmail.com
Thank you, Michael, for your answer.
Additional information: when OO crashes, the next exception appears:
com::sun::star::lang::WrappedTargetRuntimeException
And
Dear mathias,
Thank you for your reply,
Yes, stlport is delivered successfully,
Building module stlport
/cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/stlport
-
deliver -- version: 266154
Module 'stlport' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 323 files unchanged
After that we have receivd LINK errors,
All,
With the acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle now being closed
we'll see some immediate changes to our site and product. This reflects
the fact that Oracle replaces Sun in its role as part of the
OpenOffice.org project.
* source header
The copyright notice will be altered in all files
Hi Stefan, all,
Stefan Taxhet wrote (28-01-10 12:50)
With the acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle now being closed
we'll see some immediate changes to our site and product. This reflects
the fact that Oracle replaces Sun in its role as part of the
OpenOffice.org project.
[...]
Let me
On 01/28/10 12:50, Stefan Taxhet wrote:
* source header
The copyright notice will be altered in all files on trunk and the
templates adjusted too.
I'm confident you won't forget to fix in that process also the issues
raised in the VCS Keywords in License Headers thread on this mailing
list,
Dear All,
Dear All,
We are trying to build OO3.1.1 and we are using Windows XP and Cygwin.
We have successfully done ./configure and bootstrap and source
winenv.Set.sh.
After that we are trying to do dmake, but that time we have received bellow
error messages.
Making:
Dear OOo developers,
I am doing some investigation on the concurrency bug detection, and I am
studying some old concurrency bugs. And I feel OpenOffice has very
detailed bug report and thus make a very good candidate for the study. For
example, I am looking at this bug :
Hi,
Anyone have a chance to look at these question?
yours,
Julius
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c] source file appears to be licensed under
MPL-1.1. It's not tri-licensed under the usual GPL/LGPL/MPL
Julius Davies schrieb:
Hi,
Anyone have a chance to look at these question?
yes, we're currently looking into this, please expect an update soon,
Martin
yours,
Julius
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c]