Hi Bjorn,
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany a écrit :
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:31:21 +0200
eric eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Why yet another war against Education Project ?
No need for paranoia.
Yes, sure, since I read that I alienate developers and that people
eric wrote (31-03-10 10:18)
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany a écrit :
eric eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Why yet another war against Education Project ?
No need for paranoia.
Yes, sure, since I read that I alienate developers and that people
wrote reports about me,
Hi,
Le 30 mars 10 à 08:45, Cor Nouws a écrit :
eric wrote (31-03-10 10:18)
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany a écrit :
eric eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Why yet another war against Education Project ?
No need for paranoia.
Yes, sure, since I read that I alienate
eric b wrote (30-03-10 08:51)
Le 30 mars 10 à 08:45, Cor Nouws a écrit :
eric wrote (31-03-10 10:18)
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany a écrit :
eric eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Why yet another war against Education Project ?
No need for paranoia.
Yes, sure, since I
Le 29.03.2010 20:00, Emília Alezárová a écrit :
Good day
When will the new OpenOffice 3.2?
Hi,
OpenOffice.org 3.2 is already released.
Please have a look at http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
Regards.
JBF
--
Jean-Baptiste Faure
French N-L project Lead
http://fr.openoffice.org
My thanks go to Stephan Bergmann, who also responded to my question.
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:00 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Terrence,
On Friday, 2010-03-26 13:42:28 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
However, I have not found what library holds the object code for
operators_new_delete.cxx.
Hi Terrence,
A website page about building OOo says that non-product builds are
used almost exclusively within Sun. For a long time, I incorrectly
took that to be a warning that they are hard to accomplish rather than
merely a description of a regrettable state of affairs. Perhaps we do
I am trying to configure my Open Office 3.2 per Extension (change the
standard setting). My System is Windows XP (SP3).
For example I try to change some entries in the existing .xcu files. My
question is related to the usage of xcu files within the Extension
(Configuration Data). Is that a
On 03/30/10 13:31, Terrence Enger wrote:
( I think, though, that I am giving up on trying to use a non-product
build when I actually want to get work done grin /. )
:) That's exactly the reason why I want those non-pros to be
effectively assertion free---which in turn I believe can only be
On 03/30/10 14:07, sponmonster wrote:
For example I try to change some entries in the existing .xcu files. My
question is related to the usage of xcu files within the Extension
(Configuration Data). Is that a “good” way to change settings, or is it
better to change the data with the UNO-Api.
On 30/03/2010 13:31, Terrence Enger wrote:
( I think, though, that I am giving up on trying to use a non-product
build when I actually want to get work done grin /. )
before resorting to such extreme measures as not using non-product builds,
try the debug dialog (Control-Shift-Alt-D).
it lets
Ok I see the problem now, it seems that the makefile.rc was messed up when
changing copyright notice and invalid remarks where created:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO320/diff/659920c8492d/makefile.rc
This means that the current OOO320_m14 release can't be built directly from
source without
Hi Kristján,
both the CWS changefileheader3 and the OOO320 milestone m14 have
certainly been build several times before release. It's just that only
very few developers still use the ancient makefile.rc - a nice example
for the evils of having multiple build systems. I wasn't even aware that
Hi,
makefile.rc now fixed in the repository.
Regards,
Heiner
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Kristján,
both the CWS changefileheader3 and the OOO320 milestone m14 have
certainly been build several times before release. It's just that only
very few developers still use the ancient
Hi all,
Andreas Bartel wrote (30-03-10 00:48)
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
With some interest I've read all the contributions in this discussion.
I've been learning a lot about differences and interference of product
and project etc. etc.
I support Martins idea, that he likes to see a broad
Hi Andreas, *
first a disclaimer: my comments represent only my own views about the
project - I'm not speaking for anybody else (esp. not for Torsten)
Addition to the disclaimer: I have been a long-term contributor to the
project but have never really contributed code (ok a ~10 LOC patch).
is anyone using base to store all or parts of odt?
TIA
rfjones
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
17 matches
Mail list logo