in the headless scenario anyway.
So any major step towards a smaller memory footprint would be a complete
rearrangement of the content of the big libraries. Some plans have been
made about possible new code distributions but they haven't been put
into action.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
is at the same level as
the modules.
Not on linux.
Of course, but we are talking about a Windows build here. ;-)
But I wonder why you don't simply suggest a dmake clean in toplevel.
I expected that this is slower than the direct removal. But YMMV.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Wednesday, 2009-06-24 12:29:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
But I wonder why you don't simply suggest a dmake clean in toplevel.
I expected that this is slower than the direct removal. But YMMV.
Only the few milliseconds that dmake needs to interpret
/I_want_to_be_an_OpenOffice.org_developer
gives you a good starting point.
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
that the unexpected domain change could be confusing) we could
change all links in the OOo pages to links pointing to the wiki and
remove the above mentioned page.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
for next version of ODF?
TIA.
WBR,
KP.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
where I can change the default file type that is shown on the
'open file' dialog.
You can't change the default filter for open file, only the default
filter for save as.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
I could tell you how to get access to the progressbar in a filter
using our API, I don't know how this works in xslt based filters. AFAIR
it could be possible, you could ask Svante Schubert.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering
professional look, more integrated to OOo UI.
This file helped me:
https://lists.forge.osor.eu/pipermail/ooo-xadessig-it-commits/2009-May/000331.html
Best Regards
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Spiewak vspie...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Mathias Bauer
without gpc (with the
option to disable it), but no developer could tell me if that will
create a loss of functionality or not. Kai Ahrens told me that he is
going to make sure in 3.2 that gpc is no longer needed. Until then it's
unclear to me wether we need it or not.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias
m53
again). The good thing is that now the CWS is hosted with Mercurial. :-)
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
please see my comments inline.
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Moin,
rumours are that some CWS have not survived a rebase with svn (at least
they weren't very useful afterwards) and in some cases the reason was
that files added on the master between the old
of the code are built with debug=t.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
from the whole Office only. Just set the
product name property in Setup.xcu to an empty string. Unfortunately
this property is used by other features, too (e.g. help, about box,
...).
I don't consider this unfortunate. This is how it should work.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
use that in personal and
written communication. Maybe an explicit hint CWS are what other
developers name feature branches and letting time do the rest is the
best thing to do.
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
possible that you run into problems that I overlooked.
Would deploying your filter as an extension be an option? This is
possible since OOo 3.0.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please
installed you can ignore the mail.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
there is a conversion table that
converts the slot ids into the matching whichids.
Usually you don't need to care for the exact values, you just should be
aware of this fact.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
that receives the SfxPoolItems from the control and puts
it into an SfxItemSet that the document code receives as part of an
SfxRequest object.
HTH,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
good C++ knowledge but also getting familiar with an
unpredictable amount of OOo code (what exactly you will need to know
depends on where your journey will take you).
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
, it's only a hint for further
investigations.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
, if possible (means: if no platform is know where using bash is not
possible) let's drop tcsh support.
But if we don't do it: please at least let configure always generate
just one shell script, not always both of them.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Performance/Configuration#Platform_Backends
for the way I intend to modify those platform backends).
IIRC this relates to
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53781
So yes, looks like dead code.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
2 The gconf backend provides data for configuration set member
properties
/org.openoffice.Setup/Office/Factories/com.sun.star.XXX.XXXDocument/ooSetupFactoryDefaultFilter,
for XXX in Presentation, Spreadsheet, Text. Strictly speaking
OOo on your server and loads the document (sample code is
available in our SDK). The loaded document has an API to retrieve the
meta data.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't
solution.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
for such an example.
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Development
is the best place to start. If you have further questions, please come
back to the list.
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
is helpful for
8.04 also.
It if doesn't help, please tell us what exactly doesn't work for you.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo
Pavel Lastovicka wrote:
Hello,
I consider writing export filter to Textile format[1]. I need to make an
estimate how many hours it would take to write. Am I right that I need just
two filter config files for registry and a single XSLT file, similar to
odt2mediawiki.xsl?
In general all
automatically, as it happens
for the standard control types in resources.
The only reason why we put HIDs in hidother.src is that otherwise it
won't be found by the tooling for the hid.lst - the tooling is bound to
src files.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
(as this was available as a
free download at some point in time) and - if you are lucky - this
version handles your SO3 documents properly.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't
recommendation would be to use SO5 (if you
can find one) for conversion to the latest sdw format (that OOo can
hopefully import better) and then use OOo1 and your macro to export to PDF.
In case that doesn't work, please ask again.
Regards.
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead
to the appropriate section in
svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc, where starting with DEV300m68 comments explain
where these shared IDs are used.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
that not
already depend on one of these. Such code is best put into svtools
itself (or libraries located higher than it).
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I
,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
to it you could try to pass them
via environment variables, in case SO Basic supported access to the
program's environment (I don't recall that). Another alternative would
be passing these arguments via a text file that the SO Basic macro reads
in before doing its work.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias
,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
have been
renamed meanwhile or had become obsolete.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails
better viewing.
Please fill in the descriptions in the wiki or here and I'll update it
accordingly.
Nice work, thanks for doing it! I will fill some of the gaps in the next
days.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun
for keeping track with module changes until we
have decided about splitting the build and how to carry that out.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I
be defined before.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
Matthias B. wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote:
I think OOo should not even broadcast events for these documents. They
are implementation details subject to change. Components have no
business dealing with them.
What is an implementation detail
setTargetDocument (I didn't check that in the code), this
shouldn't be a problem as then you can assume that getting the execute
call first means that you are working as importer.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
and give to us your suggestions.
Are you sure that the stlport module has been built and delivered?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use
. :-) In general the instructions
in the wiki are preferable (the start page has a link in the
development section where you can start).
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
/config_office to SRC_ROOT, but I'm quite sure that it was past
the 680m79 version. So it *must* be there. Is there at least a configure.in?
Sorry that I can't help you with your Java problem.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun
After that we have receivd LINK errors,
Please see attached error log file and give to us your suggestions.
Thank you Regards,
Medwrite.
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Bauer [mailto:nospamfor...@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:19 PM
To: dev@openoffice.org
Subject
. That was already planned to happen. But the people
doing the last builds obviously haven't been aware of that, so it wasn't
done.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor
for Linux 32Bit including all other code changes made between
m67 and m72.
The svx resource files wa also split into svx, editeng and cui resource
files.
There's still room for further size reductions that could make working
on svx code less time consuming.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer
and the GraphicObject code into svtools. The module goodies then
could be removed.
This change will be effective starting with DEV300_m72.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
removed easter eggs looked strange to me as it
never existed officially. :-)
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only
perspective. Having a performance goal for such
a build up-front could allow us to do that if we are confident to reach it.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
The idea is the unification of pro and non-pro build. We have discussed
that only as an idea to save time in release engineering and a nice
opportunity for additional diagnostic abilities for customer problems,
but maybe it can help in our current
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Monday, 2010-02-15 12:34:10 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
startup would become ~6% larger by converting all #ifdef DBG_UTIL to
if (bDBG_UTIL==true). The influence on startup performance would be a
little bit less than this 6%, but probably measurable
forgotten its name. You can read
more about that in our GullFOSS blog where Ingo Schmidt has described
that some time ago.
Start http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS and enter fastest way into the
search box, this should give you a link to the blog from Ingo.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
Caolán McNamara wrote:
From m72 editengine was split out as a toplevel dir. Who should we set
as patch owner for this one ?
t...@openoffice.org
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
(because the controls are
not independent from each other and so the toolbar itself implements
some control logic), but until now I didn't see any difference from a UX
point of view.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun
MOULIN Camille wrote:
Hi Mathias, Mathias Bauer a écrit : [...]
Where do you see the Hyperlink Bar not behaving like other
toolbars?
Aregular toolbar has a drop down menu on the right end, allowing
you to choose the buttons you want to display, you can (un)anchor it,
move it around, etc
in the hyperlink bar itself could be moved to that
new control. This control then could be added to any regular toolbar
as usual. That would be doable in much shorter time. Worth thinking
about it...
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering
that his no vote for Thorsten is not founded in personal problems with
him, on the contrary: he doesn't want to give his vote to Thorsten in
spite of the respect and sympathy he has for him in person. I can't see
anything wrong here.
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:40:11 -0400
Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote:
Greetings,
What does it take to use, for example, the DBG_ASSERT function defined
in debug.hxx? I have poked around on the wiki without success.
like a very nice addition, but also like a lot of work.
Or did I misunderstood the where we use part?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use
Hi Ivan,
thanks for your suggestions. Please let me add some more technically
motivated comments.
In the same way as developers have to care for user experience, plans
for possible changes must take technical boundary conditions into
account that at least might have an influence on when
why ther HiContrast themes are as you found them.
Thanks for your thoughts and your interest in contributing,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use
will be much simpler.
Björn will keep you posted on the proceedings we have made in the last
weeks and those that will follow in the future.
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please
of pros and cons and an estimation of the expected relation between
effort and benefits, based on the current situation of OOo with our
current build system. In result it looks that investing in the GBuild
approach looks more promising.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead
will be much simpler.
Björn will keep you posted on the proceedings we have made in the last
weeks and those that will follow in the future.
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please
other mail.
Regards,
Mathias
On 05/10/2010 08:31 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi,
as already discussed here, a team
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort) is
currently evaluating how we can
improve our build system. Björn Michaelsen presented a prototype for a
new build
try to add
non-recursive elements to CMake (like including makefiles in makefiles)
you see that it lacks the necessary concepts to use that in a large
scale project. That's not bad - it's just not what we are looking for.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org
references to it have been cleared or destroyed.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails
the preconfigured files in
OfficePath\Basis\share\registry\modules\org\openoffice\TypeDetection\
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo
separately as outside of our Hamburg lab only one
top level project exists.
How do I have to setup a CMake build to support that build structure?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't
===
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks,
Aditya.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project
it that way?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
of this will be that all CWS based on m80 and
later will have status red in EIS.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists
. Especially on
Ubuntu the vanilla build seems to work better.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read
, because it knows how to build them. Our plan is that all
target types and the ways they are built are known to the build system
and declaring one of these targets automatically takes care of the
dependencies.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
might
explain why nobody started that effort.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails
also don't know what would happen here if the IDs where 0.
So we are lucky that this format is doomed. :-)
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use
. But knowing it for
sure would perhaps allow us to define a less fuzzy interface.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists
or even
necessary. ;-) The question is what is the intent of writing this code
and if that really requires such a fuzzy interface.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
can intercept - sic! - dispatch calls.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
isn't the URL, it would the command .uno:OpenURL or so, where the file
name (including the jump mark) would be one of its dispatch arguments.
Can you confirm that?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com
by
Execute calls at an instance of class SfxBindings, while the
internal one uses Execute calls at an instance of class SfxDispatcher.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
in which time span
depends on the way how a particular array is used. The more local the
code, the easier will it be to change this.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply
for us.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
with mircosoft
office, I wonder if somebody here can help me??
Did you try
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/docs/officebinaryformats.mspx?
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
external message it has emitted
For additional information, please visit our website: http://www.cnmv.es
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
On 24.06.2010 12:42, Niklas Nebel wrote:
On 06/24/10 12:29, Mathias Bauer wrote:
The idea is so good that someone is already working on it. :-)
There is ongoing work to replace a lot of ancient types like BOOL,
USHORT etc. by sal_... types, with the exception that BOOL/FASTBOOl
will be replaced
On 06/24/2010 12:42 PM, Niklas Nebel wrote:
On 06/24/10 12:29, Mathias Bauer wrote:
The idea is so good that someone is already working on it. :-)
There is ongoing work to replace a lot of ancient types like BOOL,
USHORT etc. by sal_... types, with the exception that BOOL/FASTBOOl
who invented it (instead of *fixing* the
problem when it was much easier than today as we had much less code!)
should be punished by urging them to watch soccer games from France and
Italy for at least three days without pausing. :-)
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead
-atl.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
variable that is set by configure (and should be visible in your shell
environment). ILIB contains (amongst others) the lib directory of the
solver where libxml2.lib should be found.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun
/makefile.mk
@@ -170,6 +169,7 @@
.ENDIF
$(foreach,i,$(alllangiso) openoffice_$i) : $(ADDDEPS)
+openoffice_$(defaultlangiso).archive : $(ADDDEPS)
$(foreach,i,$(alllangiso) openofficedev_$i) : $(ADDDEPS)
Maybe it helps.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
or the /LIBPATH
switch so that libraries are searched in solver/../lib. For consistency with
INCLUDE, I would use the LIB environment variable, and rename the existing LIB.
What option should we choose?
Can we export ILIB named as LIB?
-Mensaje original-
De: Mathias Bauer [mailto:nospamfor
Hi,
On 29.06.2010 16:43, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi,
there is nothing we need to do for the LIB variable as it is used
already. The LIB variable is set in the environment of the linker when
it is called. So whatever goes wrong in your build, it must have another
reason.
Currently I'm working
this problem may happen to any user. What should we do? Perhaps
the lib (lowercase) should be undefined in the variables script winenv.set.sh.
-Mensaje original-
De: Mathias Bauer [mailto:nospamfor...@gmx.de]
Enviado el: martes, 29 de junio de 2010 16:44
Para: dev@openoffice.org
Asunto: Re: [dev
501 - 600 of 674 matches
Mail list logo