On 16.06.2010 11:07, Malte Timmermann wrote:
We have
const SfxPoolItem& Get()
and
const SfxPoolItem* GetItem(...)
Not sure why we have two different Get Methods, but the first doesn't
allow to return NULL, so I assume the second one would also have to
return the same VoidItem for con
And now that I just read Bjoerns last mail wrt old/current behavior:
At least for the EditEngine I am quite sure these items have been in
some ItemPool, but never in an ItemSet.
So that might be the reason why I never had an issue with that.
Not sure what would happen with the VoidItems listed be
Mathias Bauer wrote, On 06/16/10 10:11:
> On 15.06.2010 11:47, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
>
>> Well, the implementation in new_itemsets only checks for the which id
>> being 0 and never checks for the type being an SfxVoidItem (outside
>> assertions). So an disabled item is consistently defined as
On 15.06.2010 11:47, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
Well, the implementation in new_itemsets only checks for the which id
being 0 and never checks for the type being an SfxVoidItem (outside
assertions). So an disabled item is consistently defined as any item
returning an which id of 0 in the new itemse
Am Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:04:45 +0200
schrieb Mathias Bauer :
> So this is code broken (the code in the ItemSet, not yours).
I would argue that both code is broken, because as is the ItemSet has
no well-defined contract to design against. Of course, Malte is no more
guilty than anybody else as the on
On 14.06.2010 17:49, Malte Timmermann wrote:
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 16:09:
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
schrieb Malte Timmermann:
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across
a few inte
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 16:09:
> Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
> schrieb Malte Timmermann :
>
>> Hi Bjoern,
>>
>> Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across
>>> a few interesting uses of item
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
schrieb Malte Timmermann :
> Hi Bjoern,
>
> Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across
> > a few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be
> > illegal (but I
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
> Hi all,
>
> while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across a
> few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be illegal
> (but I might be wrong there). I assumed:
> - non-void items should only be put at the
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across a
few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be illegal
(but I might be wrong there). I assumed:
- non-void items should only be put at the same which id in a set as the
which id on the item itself.
- voi
10 matches
Mail list logo
