Hi Bernd,
Looking into the allfeatures mailing list (did I already say kudos to
you for working around collab.net's bug, so this list now works,
again?), of the last 10 feature mails, 8 contained a specification link,
where 5 referred to older-and-extended specs (including the broken one).
Means
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote (11-11-2007 22:14)
While we are at it ... Somebody should look at those notes *before*
they're published.
It's nice to have automatisms, but as with other automatisms, there's a
need for manual post-work. In this case, IMO it's a strong need. In
Hi Cor.
Could this meet 'your' needs, Frank
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Features_2.3#Full_list
Ah, that's cool! Who is in charge of this page?
Ciao
Frank
--
- Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- Sun Microsystems
Hi Frank,
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote (12-11-2007 11:32)
Could this meet 'your' needs, Frank
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Features_2.3#Full_list
Ah, that's cool! Who is in charge of this page?
The volunteer :-)
Inspired by the good work done by Sophie in
Note that everywhere where there is a feature-info: in the Spec.
abstract column of the Release Notes the process used a dirty fallback
Why is that fallback dirty? I don't think that everything mentioned in
the release notes needs a full blown specification.
Seconded.
/me too
The dirty
