Re: [dev] oooimprovement thing and BUILD_SPECIAL

2009-05-19 Thread Joerg Skottke
Hi Caolán, we have a boolean function in VCL Testtool BASIC named hIsOOoImprovementTabVisible() which allows test writers to determine whether the feature is available or not. Regards, Joerg Caolán McNamara schrieb: I see that the automated test-tooling looks for the oooimprovement extension

Re: [dev] oooimprovement thing and BUILD_SPECIAL

2009-05-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:51 +0200, Joerg Skottke wrote: Hi Caolán, we have a boolean function in VCL Testtool BASIC named hIsOOoImprovementTabVisible() which allows test writers to determine whether the feature is available or not. Nevertheless, presumably oooimprovement has a purpose of

Re: [dev] oooimprovement thing and BUILD_SPECIAL

2009-05-19 Thread Bernd Eilers
Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:51 +0200, Joerg Skottke wrote: Hi Caolán, Hi there! we have a boolean function in VCL Testtool BASIC named hIsOOoImprovementTabVisible() which allows test writers to determine whether the feature is available or not. Nevertheless,

Re: [dev] oooimprovement thing and BUILD_SPECIAL

2009-05-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:47 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote: Caolán McNamara wrote: Now, well does it make sense to activate such feature on any CWS at all? I would say not much as the whole idea here is to get end-user usage patterns not usage-pattern from usages of developers or testers which