Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Jon Burgess
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 20:57 +, m*sh wrote: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 20:29, schrieb Marc Schütz: > > > > Here is what JOSM does, maybe it helps: > > > > Client -> Server: > > DELETE /api/0.5/node/285567671 HTTP/1.1 > > The Indy-components that I am using dont have a DELETE-Command - only > PUT & GET

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes ...(NOT solved)

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
2008/8/6 m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 21:23, schrieb Tom Hughes: >> m*sh wrote: > >> I don't understand what you mean by this - how do you send a DELETE >> request with a PUT method? Are you saying you put something in the XML >> that you expected would trigger a delete? > I am us

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes ...(NOT solved)

2008-08-06 Thread Thomas Wood
m*sh wrote: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 21:23, schrieb Tom Hughes: >> m*sh wrote: > >> I don't understand what you mean by this - how do you send a DELETE >> request with a PUT method? Are you saying you put something in the XML >> that you expected would trigger a delete? > I am using a component/object

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes ...(NOT solved)

2008-08-06 Thread Ian Dees
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:44 PM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using a component/object that has two methods to connect via HTTP: > PUT & GET > (no DELETE!) Your component/object does not fully implement HTTP then. I would suggest finding a different library to use for your HTTP communic

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes ...(NOT solved)

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 21:23, schrieb Tom Hughes: > m*sh wrote: > I don't understand what you mean by this - how do you send a DELETE > request with a PUT method? Are you saying you put something in the XML > that you expected would trigger a delete? I am using a component/object that has two methods

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql w no password prompt

2008-08-06 Thread Mikel Maron
Good point -- I've updated where appropriate - Original Message From: John McKerrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Openstreetmap Dev list Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:43:16 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql w no password prompt You adding the answers to a wiki page anywhere? On 6

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes ...(solved?)

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
m*sh wrote: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 20:24, schrieb Tom Hughes: >> No, you misunderstood. You should be doing DELETE but when I looked at >> the logs for that node you gave the ID for I could see you were actually >> sending a PUT request. >> >>> Actually I am using a 'put' command but the Request metho

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
Tom Evans wrote: > 2008/8/6 Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> No, you misunderstood. You should be doing DELETE but when I looked at >> the logs for that node you gave the ID for I could see you were actually >> sending a PUT request. > > Don't doubt you're right. > > But I'm thinking it might b

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql w no password prompt

2008-08-06 Thread Jon Burgess
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:46 -0700, Mikel Maron wrote: > Hi > > How is osm2pgsql run automatically for tile? It asks for a password > prompt to connect to pgsql... > > I can just go ahead an hack my local copy, but wondering if there's > another solution. Are you attempting to authenticate as a

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes ...(solved?)

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 20:24, schrieb Tom Hughes: > No, you misunderstood. You should be doing DELETE but when I looked at > the logs for that node you gave the ID for I could see you were actually > sending a PUT request. > >> Actually I am using a 'put' command but the Request method should be >> DEL

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
m*sh wrote: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 20:29, schrieb Marc Schütz: >> Here is what JOSM does, maybe it helps: >> >> Client -> Server: >> DELETE /api/0.5/node/285567671 HTTP/1.1 > > The Indy-components that I am using dont have a DELETE-Command - only > PUT & GET plus a *Request* modifier that is: GET DEL

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Evans
2008/8/6 Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, you misunderstood. You should be doing DELETE but when I looked at > the logs for that node you gave the ID for I could see you were actually > sending a PUT request. Don't doubt you're right. But I'm thinking it might be worth rejecting a node PUT w

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 20:29, schrieb Marc Schütz: > > Here is what JOSM does, maybe it helps: > > Client -> Server: > DELETE /api/0.5/node/285567671 HTTP/1.1 The Indy-components that I am using dont have a DELETE-Command - only PUT & GET plus a *Request* modifier that is: GET DELETE OR PUT -- -m*s

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Marc Schütz
Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2008 22:20 schrieb m*sh: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 19:59, schrieb Marc Schütz: > > Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2008 21:43 schrieb Tom Hughes: > >> > The HTTP-Request-Method is DELETE. > >> > >> No, the request method is PUT which is why they aren't being deleted. > > > > If I'm reading

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 19:59, schrieb Marc Schütz: > Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2008 21:43 schrieb Tom Hughes: >> > The HTTP-Request-Method is DELETE. >> >> No, the request method is PUT which is why they aren't being deleted. >> > If I'm reading the API specs correctly, there shouldn't be a payload on > D

Re: [OSM-dev] JOSM & NAVTEQ

2008-08-06 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Miércoles, 6 de Agosto de 2008, SteveC escribió: > Second they have several banks of PoI icons and road attributes and > they click on them then click on the map to add them. There may well > be something like this in JOSM by now? The livegps + surveyor plugins allow you to do that, IIRC. --

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
m*sh wrote: > Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 19:43, schrieb Tom Hughes: >> m*sh wrote: >> >>> The HTTP-Request-Method is DELETE. >> No, the request method is PUT which is why they aren't being deleted. > excerpts wiki: > [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.5] > Purpose HTTP Met

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 19:43, schrieb Tom Hughes: > m*sh wrote: > >> The HTTP-Request-Method is DELETE. > > No, the request method is PUT which is why they aren't being deleted. excerpts wiki: [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.5] Purpose HTTP Method and URL Pay

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Marc Schütz
Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2008 21:43 schrieb Tom Hughes: > m*sh wrote: > > I m sending this xml-structure as a stream > > ---cut- > > > > > > > > > > > > ---cut-- > > > > Using this: > > > > 'http://api.openstreetmap.

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
m*sh wrote: > I m sending this xml-structure as a stream > ---cut- > > > > > > ---cut-- > > Using this: > > 'http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/node/nn' > > URL - where nn is the ID of the node > > T

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql w no password prompt

2008-08-06 Thread John McKerrell
You adding the answers to a wiki page anywhere? On 6 Aug 2008, at 19:46, Mikel Maron wrote: Hi How is osm2pgsql run automatically for tile? It asks for a password prompt to connect to pgsql... I can just go ahead an hack my local copy, but wondering if there's another solution. Mikel

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Am Mi, 6.08.2008, 18:53, schrieb Tom Hughes: >> Is this the way OSM deletes nodes? Does it delete properties and put >> coords to Lat 0.0 Lon 0.0 (And clean it up at some other time)? > > No. Not if they are deleted properly. What client are you using? I m sending this xml-structure as a stream -

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
m*sh wrote: >> I could positively reproduce that: >> + Only 1 delete operation >> results in a new node at Lat 0.0 Lon 0.0 > > It is not a new node. It has the id of the deleted node - but it's > properties/tags are vanished. > > Is this the way OSM deletes nodes? Does it delete properties and pu

Re: [OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0 - Additional Info

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
> I could positively reproduce that: > + Only 1 delete operation > results in a new node at Lat 0.0 Lon 0.0 It is not a new node. It has the id of the deleted node - but it's properties/tags are vanished. Is this the way OSM deletes nodes? Does it delete properties and put coords to Lat 0.0 Lon

[OSM-dev] osm2pgsql w no password prompt

2008-08-06 Thread Mikel Maron
Hi How is osm2pgsql run automatically for tile? It asks for a password prompt to connect to pgsql... I can just go ahead an hack my local copy, but wondering if there's another solution. Mikel ps thanks for all the help the past couple days ___ dev

[OSM-dev] Strange: nodes appearing at Lat 0 Lon 0

2008-08-06 Thread m*sh
Hi, I've just noticed a strange thing: When I delete a node it is obviously added to location Lat 0.0 Lon 0.0 There are some 600 around there. I could positively reproduce that: + Only 1 delete operation results in a new node at Lat 0.0 Lon 0.0 Any ideas what's goin' wrong? -- -m*sh- ___

[OSM-dev] JOSM & NAVTEQ

2008-08-06 Thread SteveC
I took a ride in a NAVTEQ vehicle yesterday at the ESRI User Conference in San Diego. Basically the guys drive you around and show you how they add streets and points of interest. It's a 4x4 car with six cameras on the roof and a shiny GPS antenna. Up front they have a driver calling things

Re: [OSM-dev] New servers?

2008-08-06 Thread Grant Slater
Gregory wrote: > And who chose the names? I'm to blame. Dragon naming theme was by brief vote: (wiki, irc #osm and irc #osm-de) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:Servers#Server_Naming_Theme_Discussion_and_Vote - Fuchur (German spelling of Falkor from Never Ending Story) - Sarel (Sare

Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-legal-talk] Google Street View

2008-08-06 Thread SteveC
No, it cannot be used. I'm talking to some people about this but we're not at a stage where I can announce anything positive or negative about it. On 5 Aug 2008, at 02:13, Sjors Provoost wrote: > Hi everyone (legal and dev), > > Now that the Google Street view imagery is growing pretty rapidly

Re: [OSM-dev] New servers?

2008-08-06 Thread Gregory
And who chose the names? 2008/8/5 Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Raphael Studer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've found some news servers on the munin page: > > > > http://munin.openstreetmap.org/openstreetmap/draco.openstreetmap.html > > http://munin

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Tom Hughes wrote: > > Is it all database only, or were all seperate files stored? > > The files are all on disk, but the metadata that tells us what is > public and what is private is in the database. Thus a script that moves them in to a private/public directory, and access t

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> Well there isn't any easy way other than fetching them from the API as >> they are not stored separately from the private ones so some code would >> have to be written to

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Tom Hughes wrote: > Well there isn't any easy way other than fetching them from the API as > they are not stored separately from the private ones so some code would > have to be written to filter them out. Is it all database only, or were all seperate files stored? > Is this

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Where can an OSM user request all tracks ever uploaded? >> >> If you mean th

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Tom Hughes wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where can an OSM user request all tracks ever uploaded? > > If you mean the raw tracks, then the answer is you can't, as some of > them are not marked public so we don

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Erik Johansson wrote: > There should be around 30GB[1] of raw gpx data on the server. You will > probably never need all GPX tracks, so webscraping a couple of > houndred tracks slowly is probably the way to go. I recently > downloaded a thousand tracks, and a houndred would ha

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where can an OSM user request all tracks ever uploaded? If you mean the raw tracks, then the answer is you can't, as some of them are not marked public so we don't make them available. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAI

Re: [OSM-dev] how to change the delimiter in rails asset urls?

2008-08-06 Thread John McKerrell
On 6 Aug 2008, at 01:21, Tom Hughes wrote: > 2008/8/6 Mikel Maron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I've just removed that bit from my local server, and now it works. >> >> How are these urls being resolved then? > > They rely on the fact that lighttpd+fastcgi (and indeed webrick) does > not care about a

Re: [OSM-dev] curiosity killed the cat...

2008-08-06 Thread Erik Johansson
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> > the gps points data are related in some way in the DB to the gpx they >> > come from? >> >> Yes, the table holding the GPX points has a reference to the table >> holding the