Hi all,
Not sure if this has been discussed recently, but we've been thinking
about improving osmosis PBF reading performance over at Telenav. My
colleague Jon (cc) has come up with a suggestion that I want to put
forward for discussion. I'm posting this to both osmosis-dev as well
as dev because
Hi all,
Not sure if this has been discussed recently, but we've been thinking
about improving osmosis PBF reading performance over at Telenav. My
colleague Jon (cc) has come up with a suggestion that I want to put
forward for discussion. I'm posting this to both osmosis-dev as well
as dev because
Hello OSM developers,
Over the last few years I have worked on several pieces of software that
consume and produce the PBF format. I have always appreciated the
advantages of PBF over XML for our use cases, but over time it became
apparent to me that PBF is significantly more complex than would
On Di, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:56:23 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Not sure if this has been discussed recently, but we've been thinking
about improving osmosis PBF reading performance over at Telenav. My
colleague Jon (cc) has come up with a suggestion that I want to put
forward for discussion.
On Di, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:56:23 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Not sure if this has been discussed recently, but we've been thinking
about improving osmosis PBF reading performance over at Telenav. My
colleague Jon (cc) has come up with a suggestion that I want to put
forward for discussion.
On 4/28/2015 4:35 PM, andrew byrd wrote:
Hello OSM developers,
Over the last few years I have worked on several pieces of software
that consume and produce the PBF format. I have always appreciated the
advantages of PBF over XML for our use cases, but over time it became
apparent to me that
6 matches
Mail list logo
