Richard --
I filed a bug for this, there was some discussion, and I closed it:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1754
Feel free to reopen if you think this needs more discussion. The consensus
seemed to be that lakes within forests should be tagged as inner of the
forest
Hi
Does the combined wood/forest update include landcover=trees? If not it
needs to be included all three should render the same (IMO).
Cheers
Dave F.
On 15/08/2015 03:27, Paul Norman wrote:
This email is also in user diary form at osm.org/user/pnorman/diary/35589
where issue numbers
I'm on the fence about this. Does the 'general purpose' mapnik rendering
need such distinctions? Would the vast majority of end users really
care. Could it even make it more confusing for them?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 15/08/2015 12:45, tony wroblewski wrote:
The woodland change looks much better,
On 8/14/2015 7:27 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
This email is also in user diary form at osm.org/user/pnorman/diary/35589
where issue numbers are linked.
I forgot to mention in the earlier message, please file any bug reports
at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto
4 matches
Mail list logo
