You should probably take note of the NL / OpenStreetPhoto guys' efforts to do
SIFT on streetsigns. It isn't as simple as you might think.
One thing I will say though is you might get better results looking at the
Affine SIFT (ASIFT) algorithm instead.
http://www.cmap.polytechnique.fr/~yu/resear
Matt Amos wrote:
> sounds awesome!
+1
If this could work off a straight-angle photo, but with only a
mobile phone camera, that could be pretty nice to work with.
Tom
> cheers,
>
> matt
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Tijs Zwinkels
> wrote:
>> So, I've decided to take on this project.
sounds awesome!
cheers,
matt
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Tijs Zwinkels
wrote:
> So, I've decided to take on this project. :)
> I'm currently writing my proposal, which I'll post to the wiki and submit at
> the GSoC site in 1 ~ 2 hrs time. (let me know if you want to see the
> intermediate
So, I've decided to take on this project. :)
I'm currently writing my proposal, which I'll post to the wiki and submit at
the GSoC site in 1 ~ 2 hrs time. (let me know if you want to see the
intermediate versions, I can just post to the wiki whatever I have already)
Just bouncing a few last ideas,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> > I think stitching is something that is lets say 'available', referencing
> > images is too. But I would really love to see some thing like robust
> > automatic traffic sign recognition,
FYI I just sent this to the osm dev list re one of the Google Summer
of Code projects.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Shaun McDonald
Date: 1 April 2009 17:20:28 BST
To: Karl Newman
Cc: Tom Evans , dev@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] [GSoC] A GPX photo stamper.
On 1 Apr 2009, at 1
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> I think stitching is something that is lets say 'available', referencing
> images is too. But I would really love to see some thing like robust
> automatic traffic sign recognition, or maybe even streetname OCR.
> Ambitious but certainly do
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Tijs Zwinkels wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> >
> I know this is most definitely not the first time that geotagging photo's
> with gps data has been attempted.
You are right... ;)
http://code.google.com/p/gpicsync/wiki/OtherGeocodingSoftware
Tijs Zwinkels wrote:
> Yet, if I have a bunch of pictures that I want to geotag on my Linux
> desktop, I basically have no idea where to go. Fact remains that most
> of the software out there looks dodgy and is closed source, or is hard
> to use.
Digikam does it - http://www.digikam.org
As does
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>
>
> Could you tell us what the difference is with probably any application is
> that you type in google 'gps tagger', maybe it is the term webbased, but
> doesn't that assume we host those photos too?
>
> Lets say I do see applications tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
