Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Matt Amos
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Ed Loach wrote: > "The current schedule foresees the final magnet being reinstalled by > the end of March 2009, with the LHC being cold and ready for > powering tests by the end of June 2009." LHC 0.6... weird ;-) cheers, matt ___

Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Ed Loach
> it might. i'm sure i can think up a semi-plausible situation > involving > scientists at CERN being so frustrated with the broken > relations they > don't notice that LHC is creating a massive black-hole. ;-) They won't have restarted it since the repairs within the next two weeks. From http://p

Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Matt Amos
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Dave Stubbs wrote: > So I'd just wait two weeks. It's not going to cause the world to end > in the meantime. it might. i'm sure i can think up a semi-plausible situation involving scientists at CERN being so frustrated with the broken relations they don't notice th

Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Dave Stubbs
2009/4/6 Stefan de Konink : > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Dave Stubbs wrote: > >> Anyway, Shaun refactored the whole lot for API 0.6. It now atomically >> checks relation consistency within the rails models when doing an >> update rather than relying on the caller to do it. So this should be >> fixed in a

Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Dave Stubbs wrote: > Anyway, Shaun refactored the whole lot for API 0.6. It now atomically > checks relation consistency within the rails models when doing an > update rather than relying on the caller to do it. So this should be > fixed in a couple of weeks a long with everyth

Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Dave Stubbs
2009/4/6 Richard Fairhurst : > Stefan de Konink wrote: > >> Now how is it possible that there was no 415 on that update? > > I'm going to pass on this one as I didn't write the Potlatch > relations code, Dave did - any thoughts? > I'm guessing that's here: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/si

Re: [OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Stefan de Konink wrote: > Now how is it possible that there was no 415 on that update? I'm going to pass on this one as I didn't write the Potlatch relations code, Dave did - any thoughts? cheers Richard ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org ht

[OSM-dev] Please advise; I really don't get how this can corrupt so badly

2009-04-06 Thread Stefan de Konink
I really want to understand this; and to my intel transactions of such amount of time are just not bound to fail, looking at the timestamp. http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/way/28366538/history http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/relation/108258/history Alpinfuchs deleted way 28366538 at 20