Grant Slater wrote:
> Devs,
>
> Recent planet files available from: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
> will be disrupted for the next few days. Apologies for the disruption.
>
> Hopefully be fixed within the next 48 hours.
>
Patched planet files are now available. Big thank you to Frederik Ramm
Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
> On 19 Mar 2009, at 09:52, Brett Henderson wrote:
>
>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. I meant when the API 0.6 goes live and the
>> database is upgraded to the 0.6 schema then the Osmosis tasks supporting
>> 0.6 data will support creating full history change files. The Osmos
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Ceriel Jacobs wrote:
> > I suggested to Grant to actually do a benchmark instead of just
> > picking
> > the next product from the stack.
>
>
> When benckmarking different database systems, don't forget to include
> Virtuoso.
>
> Here a TPC-D benchmark comparison (lower is bet
Stefan de Konink wrote:
>>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. I meant when the API 0.6 goes live
>>> and the
>>> database is upgraded to the 0.6 schema then the Osmosis tasks
>>> supporting
>>> 0.6 data will support creating full history change files. The
>>> Osmosis
>>> version is currently 0.3
Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. I meant when the API 0.6 goes live and the
>> database is upgraded to the 0.6 schema then the Osmosis tasks supporting
>> 0.6 data will support creating full history change files. The Osmosis
>> version is currently 0.30.2, I'll release a 0.31
On 19 Mar 2009, at 09:52, Brett Henderson wrote:
Sorry if that wasn't clear. I meant when the API 0.6 goes live and
the
database is upgraded to the 0.6 schema then the Osmosis tasks
supporting
0.6 data will support creating full history change files. The Osmosis
version is currently 0.3
Grant Slater wrote:
> Devs,
>
> Recent planet files available from: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
> will be disrupted for the next few days. Apologies for the disruption.
>
> Hopefully be fixed within the next 48 hours.
>
> Reasons? Look over here:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk
Stefan de Konink wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Brett Henderson wrote:
>
>
>> Osmosis will provide the capability to do this from 0.6 onwards. If
>> disk space isn't an issue on the planet server I'll set it up as soon as
>> I get time after 0.6 goes live. It has the ability to go back in time
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:23:23 +1100, Brett Henderson
> wrote:
>
>> Osmosis will provide the capability to do this from 0.6 onwards. If
>> disk space isn't an issue on the planet server I'll set it up as soon as
>> I get time after 0.6 goes live. It has
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:23:23 +1100, Brett Henderson
wrote:
> Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> Please; why don't we just ignore all previous planets and create a
>> new planet and start to produce daily (full) history? Where we dump our
>> old history excludi
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Brett Henderson wrote:
> Osmosis will provide the capability to do this from 0.6 onwards. If
> disk space isn't an issue on the planet server I'll set it up as soon as
> I get time after 0.6 goes live. It has the ability to go back in time
> and produce full history diffs fo
Stefan de Konink wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
>
>>> Isn't that a bit waste of resources?
>>>
>>>
>> From a legal perspective no.
>>
>
> Please; why don't we just ignore all previous planets and create a
> new planet and start to produce daily (full) history?
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> > Isn't that a bit waste of resources?
> >
>
> From a legal perspective no.
Please; why don't we just ignore all previous planets and create a
new planet and start to produce daily (full) history? Where we dump our
old history excluding Teleatlas data
2009/3/19 Stefan de Konink
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Grant Slater wrote:
>
> > Patched planet files will become available shortly, but they too take
> > time to generate.
>
> Are you saying you are going to regenerate all previous planet files?
> Isn't that a bit waste of resources?
>
A significant
On 19 Mar 2009, at 06:22, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Grant Slater wrote:
>
>> Patched planet files will become available shortly, but they too take
>> time to generate.
>
> Are you saying you are going to regenerate all previous planet files?
Yes.
> Isn't that a bit waste of
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Grant Slater wrote:
> Patched planet files will become available shortly, but they too take
> time to generate.
Are you saying you are going to regenerate all previous planet files?
Isn't that a bit waste of resources?
Stefan
___
Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-March/035381.html
>
> So could you elaborate the downtime? We have a 'perfect history
> system' and since we are talking 'all accounts have been identified'
> wouldn't that be a perfect test case for our 'users that do
Grant Slater wrote:
> Recent planet files available from: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
> will be disrupted for the next few days. Apologies for the disruption.
>
> Hopefully be fixed within the next 48 hours.
>
> Reasons? Look over here:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-Ma
Devs,
Recent planet files available from: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
will be disrupted for the next few days. Apologies for the disruption.
Hopefully be fixed within the next 48 hours.
Reasons? Look over here:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-March/035381.html
/ Grant
19 matches
Mail list logo
