Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-14 Thread Gerd Petermann
rd Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:21:16 +0200 From: colin.sm...@xs4all.nl To: dev@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source As there is an indefinite number of data consumers, this is of course impossible... How would you ev

[OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread GerdP
Hi all, during the last days I've checked hundreds of places where OSM inspector http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ complains about something. Doing that I commented this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/8335705 As don-vip suggests in his reply I propose a mechanical edit :

Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread Chris Hill
On 13/10/15 08:56, GerdP wrote: Hi all, during the last days I've checked hundreds of places where OSM inspector http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ complains about something. Doing that I commented this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/8335705 As don-vip suggests in his reply I

Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread Colin Smale
As there is an indefinite number of data consumers, this is of course impossible... How would you ever be able to update the tagging if you have to get consent or acquiescence from every data consumer? What is your suggestion for sorting out "spaghetti tagging"? How do we ever do any

Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 10/13/2015 08:10 PM, Gerd Petermann wrote: > my motivation is simple: > JOSM claims that the old tag should not be used, > the wiki is also clear: > "Use generator:source > =*instead." Yes, but JOSM presets and Wiki pages are not

Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread François Lacombe
(Sent from phone) Hi Gerd, Such an edit can improve data consistency and your idea sounds good. As a member of the team who supported the power refinement proposal including the generator: source key, I just warn regarding the generator value which was used instead of power=plant. Power_source

Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread Gerd Petermann
so I think a cleanup isthe best solution. Gerd > Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + > generator:source > To: gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com > From: o...@raggedred.net > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:43:48 +0100 > > On 13/10/15 18:07, Ger

Re: [OSM-dev] proposal for mechanical edit reg. power_source + generator:source

2015-10-13 Thread Simon Poole
I would have thought that it is obvious, but perhaps not. This discussion clearly belongs on the tagging mailing list and not here. Simon Am 13.10.2015 um 22:25 schrieb François Lacombe: > > (Sent from phone) > > Hi Gerd, > > Such an edit can improve data consistency and your idea sounds good. >