On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 20:40, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 05/01/12 17:59, Peter Gervai wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 17:06, Tom Hughest...@compton.nu wrote:
Apart from that is there any plans to implement differential retrieval
(I'm sure I'm not alone with this) and listing only the
Hi,
As well as the original poster, I might be interested in raw gpx tracks data
The plan is just to provide a dump - if other people want to build clever
tools on top of that data then that's fine.
It remind me of that thread :
Hello,
I tried to did the homework and looked pretty hard which made me the
impression that GPS traces are the orphans of OSM. They are hardly
ever mentioned in the developers docs, they are not part of the
architecture schema graphics and only a brief sentence informs us that
it is not yet
On 05/01/12 15:38, Peter Gervai wrote:
I tried to did the homework and looked pretty hard which made me the
impression that GPS traces are the orphans of OSM. They are hardly
ever mentioned in the developers docs, they are not part of the
architecture schema graphics and only a brief sentence
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 17:06, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 05/01/12 15:38, Peter Gervai wrote:
I already have your email that you sent me last night, and would have
replied to it when I got a chance. You really don't need to keep spamming
every communication channel we have about
On 05/01/12 17:59, Peter Gervai wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 17:06, Tom Hughest...@compton.nu wrote:
Yes, that's exactly what the code that has been written does.
Apart from that is there any plans to implement differential retrieval
(I'm sure I'm not alone with this) and listing only the
6 matches
Mail list logo
