Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 21:55, Jim Burt jimb...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I'm interested in using OpenStreetMap for an internally facing website for my company (no public access). This is going to be a small app with very limited users and page views. I've reviewed the licensing, and this

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I'm also pretty sure that you can just completely ignore the license since you're only using the data within your own organization. The licence only kicks in when you're doing re-distribution to third

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, I'm also pretty sure that you can just completely ignore the license since you're only using the data within your own organization. The licence only kicks in when you're doing re-distribution to third parties.

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: A license may have any number of terms in. It might say that any changes (internal or not) are required to be redistributed back to the upstream provider. This is a term that the original Plan 9 license had, for example.

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:31, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I'm also pretty sure that you can just completely ignore the license since you're only using the data within your own organization. The licence

Re: [OSM-dev] Revert of changesets

2010-08-05 Thread Dan Karran
On 18 July 2010 23:37, Dan Karran d...@karran.net wrote: Please could somebody revert the recent changesets by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tomgus as they all appear to be destructive. Not sure if it's intentional or accidental at this point. I have just contacted the user, and haven't

Re: [OSM-dev] Revert of changesets

2010-08-05 Thread Grant Slater
On 5 August 2010 14:16, Dan Karran d...@karran.net wrote: On 18 July 2010 23:37, Dan Karran d...@karran.net wrote: Please could somebody revert the recent changesets by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tomgus as they all appear to be destructive. Not sure if it's intentional or accidental at

Re: [OSM-dev] Revert of changesets

2010-08-05 Thread Dan Karran
On 5 August 2010 14:26, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: On 5 August 2010 14:16, Dan Karran d...@karran.net wrote: On 18 July 2010 23:37, Dan Karran d...@karran.net wrote: Please could somebody revert the recent changesets by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tomgus as they all

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM and Java 6

2010-08-05 Thread Sebastian Klein
Sebastian Klein wrote: I guess we also need a message box for Java 5 users trying to run JOSM = 3378. Currently it shows only the generic This is always a coding error-Box. Done. (In [3417]) The following classes need to be Java 5 compatible for this message box to show up: JOSM

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Hi, On 5 August 2010 14:08, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I'm also pretty sure that you can just completely ignore the license since you're only using the data within your own organization. The

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El día Thursday 05 August 2010 16:27:49, andrzej zaborowski dijo: On that note the debian free software guidelines do include a test that can be applied to a license text that ensure users don't have to do anything unless they redistribute the binaries for example (the desert island test).

Re: [OSM-dev] licensing question

2010-08-05 Thread Emilie Laffray
2010/8/5 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es And we have the cake test, inspired by the DFSG: http://blog.okfn.org/2010/03/15/the-cake-test-of-freedom/ But the cake is a lie. Emilie Laffray ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-dev] troubles installing osm2pgsql on Mac OS X 10.6: make fail

2010-08-05 Thread owntheweb
Hello Dane, I'll be sure to check out homebrew in the morning. I also don't mind uninstalling macports, at least temporarily (with my experience level, I don't recall what I installed it for initially) to get this thing up. For the lines you mentioned, here is the full printout (no luck this

Re: [OSM-dev] troubles installing osm2pgsql on Mac OS X 10.6: make fail

2010-08-05 Thread owntheweb
Updated questions regarding this topic: -If I uninstall macports, do I need to reinstall all the related libraries? (I installed some from source, and some from binaries found at http://www.kyngchaos.com/software:frameworks, none with macports that I am aware of) -Homebrew looks like a ruby on

Re: [OSM-dev] troubles installing osm2pgsql on Mac OS X 10.6: make fail

2010-08-05 Thread owntheweb
Sorry, one more update. 'file is not of required architecture' just clicked in the brain. Are these the libraries I need to re-install first? -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/troubles-installing-osm2pgsql-on-Mac-OS-X-10-6-make-fail-tp5374153p5377934.html Sent

[OSM-dev] Download invalid xml data with bbox request

2010-08-05 Thread Thomas Emge
Every now and then I run into some invalid xml document being downloaded when I request data with a bounding box like http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/map?bbox=9.97014,53.57199,10.02984,53.59460 The downloaded xml document contains a section where the response looks like it is starting a

[josm-dev] Windows-Installer: default projection is WGS84

2010-08-05 Thread Sebastian Klein
Hi, I just tried the windows installer and it creates the following default preference file: projection=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.projection.Epsg4326 layerlist.visible=true selectionlist.visible=true commandstack.visible=true propertiesdialog.visible=true