[OSM-dev] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Ideas for OSM enhancements

2007-12-31 Thread Karl Newman
Forgot to reply-all to the list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Dec 31, 2007 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] Ideas for OSM enhancements To: Igor Brejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Dec 30, 2007 11:05 PM, Igor Brejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: [OSM-dev] planetosm-to-db.pl (+errors)

2007-12-31 Thread Stefan de Konink
Martijn van Oosterhout schreef: > On Dec 31, 2007 12:48 PM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Martijn van Oosterhout schreef: >>> On Dec 31, 2007 4:12 AM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just found out that the assumption of 100*1000*1000 is not enough anymore.

Re: [OSM-dev] planetosm-to-db.pl (+errors)

2007-12-31 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Dec 31, 2007 12:48 PM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout schreef: > > On Dec 31, 2007 4:12 AM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I just found out that the assumption of 100*1000*1000 is not enough > >> anymore. Of course I was not amused. > > > >

Re: [OSM-dev] planetosm-to-db.pl (+errors)

2007-12-31 Thread Stefan de Konink
Martijn van Oosterhout schreef: > On Dec 31, 2007 4:12 AM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just a hint, >> >> I just found out that the assumption of 100*1000*1000 is not enough >> anymore. Of course I was not amused. > > About time to make it dynamic I suppose I suppose you ca

Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-newbies] How to convert NAD83 to latitude/longitude?

2007-12-31 Thread Andy Allan
On Dec 31, 2007 12:30 AM, Kelly Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Andy. I found that using cURL did exactly what I wanted, > without my having to use Flash, download Java 1.5, etc. > > At the risk of offending TPTB (which I believe includes yourself?), I > documented the process: > > http:

Re: [OSM-dev] planetosm-to-db.pl

2007-12-31 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Dec 31, 2007 4:12 AM, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a hint, > > I just found out that the assumption of 100*1000*1000 is not enough > anymore. Of course I was not amused. About time to make it dynamic I suppose Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTEC