On 29 Mar 2008, at 14:21, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Jon Burgess wrote:
I dumped the same data myself with the planet dump tools and it
produces
the same invalid output. I have added a line into the planet dump
code
to replace this with a ?.
Now that I have found the links above I
Begin forwarded message:
From: Konstantin Asarowski via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 30 March 2008 13:53:50 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Froscon #5696] Call for Projects FrOSCon 2008
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Steve!
Please deliver this invitation to interested developers and
Osmosis is using the inbuilt Java SAX parser which directly reads data
from an InputStream, there is no simple place where you can check data
and sanitise it before processing it. It may be possible to write my
own FilterInputStream that sits in between the underlying data stream
and the SAX
Hi All,
I've finished coding new bounding box extraction in osmosis. It seems
to work correctly although I admit I haven't tested it thoroughly yet.
If anybody wishes to take a look or better yet improve the PostGIS usage
I'll welcome all feedback.
BACKGROUND
I've had a number of abortive
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came up with loads of great ideas just to realise that Frederik Ramm has
written pretty much the same on the wiki page ?Changesets and Reverts?.
I've thought for a long time that OSM needs a Subversion-style global
revision number and atomic
On Mar 31, 2008, at 12:00, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
Also as a civil engineer I can see some merit in having elevation
data for
physical objects in the database. However, we don't really have a
good way
of collecting data that is remotely accurate to the level at which
it
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came up with loads of great ideas just to realise that Frederik Ramm
has
written pretty much the same on the wiki page ?Changesets and Reverts?.
I've thought for a long
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Robert Vollmert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 12:00, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
Also as a civil engineer I can see some merit in having elevation
data for
physical objects in the database. However, we don't really have a
good
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Karl Newman wrote:
Well, that sounds like a nice idea, but it's fraught with peril. You
wouldn't be able to arbitrarily select any given changeset/commit for
reversion because of edits that may have happened after that commit.
There would need to be some kind of conflict
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Brett Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, yell if anybody violently disagrees and thinks there is a bug
that needs fixing in osmosis.
While I agree in general, osmoss does currently make the assumption
that any character that appears in a string in the
Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
Sjors Provoost wrote:
Sent: 30 March 2008 12:06 PM
To: MilesTogoe
Cc: dev@openstreetmap.org; Karl Newman
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Altitude data (cycle) route profiles
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, MilesTogoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frederik
Robert Vollmert wrote:
Not sure how common they are, but there's some GPS units with built-in
barometer (Garmin Etrex Vista HCX at least). The data they provide
should be good enough to be useful.
Those sensors need calibration against a known point and can give a huge
offset when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
| On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Oh, looking at that it seems like there are plenty of people already
| working on this. Basically you have done all the thinking and on the
| Hackathon
Lambertus wrote:
Robert Vollmert wrote:
Not sure how common they are, but there's some GPS units with built-in
barometer (Garmin Etrex Vista HCX at least). The data they provide
should be good enough to be useful.
Those sensors need calibration against a known point and can
From: MilesTogoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 31 March 2008 3:40 PM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder)
Cc: 'Sjors Provoost'; dev@openstreetmap.org; 'Karl Newman'
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Altitude data (cycle) route profiles
what is the accuracy on regular GPS elevation ? +- ? Here in
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: MilesTogoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 31 March 2008 3:40 PM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder)
Cc: 'Sjors Provoost'; dev@openstreetmap.org; 'Karl Newman'
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Altitude data
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Brett Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, yell if anybody violently disagrees and thinks there is a bug
that needs fixing in osmosis.
While I agree in general, osmoss does currently make the assumption
that
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:25 +0100, SteveC wrote:
that covers input... what about the existing broken strings? I assume
this would be horrible to do in the database, but easier for someone
to parse planet and update via the api.
I've deleted the relation which was causing the problem
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 16:29 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Brett Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, yell if anybody violently disagrees and thinks there is a bug
that needs fixing in osmosis.
While I agree in general, osmoss does currently
Hi,
I can imagine a case being made for then at some point.
I can see people wanting to add notes with newlines already.
Actually I'd like to garnish my important notes with a ^G every now
and then. Since we now have excellent audio support in JOSM, I figure
it should be possible ;-)
Bye
20 matches
Mail list logo
