> Not sure if anyone's aware but the dev server appears to have been down
> (can't
> access via http or ssh) all day Friday.
>
Yes are aware. I am going first thing in the morning to fix.
Regards
Grant
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
Hello everyone,
Not sure if anyone's aware but the dev server appears to have been down (can't
access via http or ssh) all day Friday.
Nick
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
From: Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In part it's an entirely selfish attitude in as much as that Adobe
> show no signs of wanting to support flash on 64 bit linux which means
> that I am left having to rely on the free players or struggling to
> use the 32 bit flash plugin via a kludgy wrappe
Frederik and all,
Is there now a distinct description on the OSM Wiki, how polygons are
defined in OSM? (e.g. self-intersections allowed? inner holes?)
And: Outer boundaries seem to be encoded simply by the fact that first and
last point have the same coordinates(?). But how are inner boundaries
bvh wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:37:57PM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> The other one is that it would be good if the getway call, in
>
> Just curious : what does this call actually do in fact?
Just gets a way and its tags, and all its nodes and their tags.
http://trac.openstreetmap.o
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:03 PM, bvh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:37:57PM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> > The other one is that it would be good if the getway call, in
>
> Just curious : what does this call actually do in fact?
>
something similar to way//full, bu
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:37:57PM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> The other one is that it would be good if the getway call, in
Just curious : what does this call actually do in fact?
cu bart
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists
> The key aspect of this that prefers AS1 over AS3 is that ... we can do
> it! :) Open Source tools are used in the compilation of Potlatch, and so
> long as that is the case, we have the ability to do fancy setups like
> this without having to worry about Adobe chasing us down with license
>
> -- AS1 / AS3
>
> Dave - I think your definition of donkey balls might be different to
> mine. ;) Or rather, when you've been sucking horse balls for several
> years then donkey balls don't seem very different.
>
> Er, I should probably rephrase that.
>
Yeah, I don't think the relative merits of
(My response here is developer-oriented; sent only to dev, and not to
talk.)
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:37:57PM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> The other one is that it would be good if the getway call, in
> particular, could exist in _both_ SQL and Rails forms in the code,
> with a switch c
SteveC wrote:
> Also to broaden the debate a bit - one area potlatch can improve a
> lot, and something we want to help, is editing existing data. Go to a
> random area of the US and try using Potlatch to improve TIGER data,
> especially in non-street-grid areas. You'll quickly figure out some
> t
Thanks for some really helpful and interesting responses. (Thanks
especially to Tom C for a very valuable perspective.)
-- API
The API has come up a lot. I've said before and will happily restate
now that I think it would be great to get Potlatch talking Rails on
the serverside, rather tha
On 2 May 2008, at 12:38, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> Some things don't require referential integreity: selecting ways/nodes
> within a bounding box can't hurt the referential integrity of the
> database (so long as the code is well-maintained), so the harm in
> converting those methods (which are
On 2 May 2008, at 10:52, Dave Stubbs wrote:
> From what Richard said it implies to me that any new editor would be
> open source, but you'd have to ask CloudMade.. who as yet haven't
> actually made any statement at all on the whole issue... probably a
> sensible plan of action given your po
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:27:38PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > I won't pretend that I know nearly as much about the rails code as you
> > do, but it seems like some of these would be better abstracted out. If
> > that were the case -- that is, that all the Rails code on the site used
> > the same
Richard
I'm sorry you think informal private chats are now in the public
domain, I'll keep it in mind.
All
This is not quite what happened.
For a start, this doesn't really have anything to do with CloudMade,
it started a long time before that. It's about the maintainability and
quality o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> To summarise I think we both want the same thing, but you perhaps
>> think somebody should just sit down and bang an AMF version of the
>> current
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> To summarise I think we both want the same thing, but you perhaps
> think somebody should just sit down and bang an AMF version of the
> current XML API and I'm happy with trying to incrementally move
> towards that position?
Well, I do
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> 2008/5/2 Yann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Well, a couple of questions.
> > - Is cloudmade the same company with which SteveC tried to put
> > advertising on openstreetmap a year ago, putting it online without asking
> > any
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:25:04AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:18:58AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> Well I assume the client app would make a request to /api/0.5/user/token
> >>
2008/5/2 Yann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, a couple of questions.
> - Is cloudmade the same company with which SteveC tried to put advertising
> on openstreetmap a year ago, putting it online without asking anybody
> before, arguing it was because of money issue which proved wrong after a
> couple
Tom Hughes wrote:
>Sent: 02 May 2008 9:51 AM
>To: dev@openstreetmap.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] The future of Potlatch
>
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> For most purposes AS3 probably is a better language - except for the
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [warning - long ponderous e-mail follows!]
>
> Hi all,
>
> A fairly weighty issue concerning the future of Potlatch has arisen,
> and I'm completely baffled as to what to do - so I thought I'd "ask the
> community" for
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For most purposes AS3 probably is a better language - except for the
> fairly major proviso there's no open-source player even in development.
As far as I'm concerned this is quite a key point, although I know
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:24:35AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> "Tom Carden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I think the fact that it has its own API is a much bi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:18:58AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> Well I assume the client app would make a request to /api/0.5/user/token
>> or something with noraml username+password HTTP authentication and get
26 matches
Mail list logo
