Re: [OSM-dev] Osmosis enableDateParsing

2009-01-11 Thread Brett Henderson
Jochen Topf wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:31:03PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: > >> Jochen Topf wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:29:50PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: >>> >>> Jochen Topf wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:06:59PM +1

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 and changeset tags

2009-01-11 Thread Łukasz Jernaś
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > >for 0.6 editing, JOSM will stop adding "created_by" tags to > individual objects (and might even remove existing ones, subject to > discussion) because I consider this unecessary database pollution. > Instead, the software and vers

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 and changeset tags

2009-01-11 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Frederik Ramm wrote: >for 0.6 editing, JOSM will stop adding "created_by" tags > to individual objects (and might even remove existing ones, > subject to discussion) because I consider this unecessary > database pollution. Instead, the software and version will > be available from the chan

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 and changeset tags

2009-01-11 Thread Joerg Ostertag (OSM Tettnang/Germany)
On Sonntag 11 Januar 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > ... > client=JOSM > client-version=1234 This sounds good. Even putting it into the same tag ( like "client=josm/1.2.14-svn1234" ) would be nice. > For JOSM, I also intend to add something like "client-plugins=a,b,c,d" > where the installed

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 and changeset tags

2009-01-11 Thread Jochen Topf
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:21:37AM +1000, Hugh Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:01:50 +0100 > Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > for 0.6 editing, JOSM will stop adding "created_by" tags to > > individual objects (and might even remove existing ones, subject to > > discussion) because I consid

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmosis enableDateParsing

2009-01-11 Thread Jochen Topf
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:31:03PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: > Jochen Topf wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:29:50PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: >> >>> Jochen Topf wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:06:59PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: > However it should