[OSM-dev] mapnik

2009-05-01 Thread Mohamad Ali
Hi guys I have this situation: u...@pc1:~$ cd mapnik u...@pc1:~/mapnik$ source set-mapnik-env nothing happen on the screen ./customize-mapnik-map $MAPNIK_MAP_FILE nothing happen on the screen sudo ./customize-mapnik-map $MAPNIK_MAP_FILE Use of uninitialized value $ENV{MAPNIK_DBPORT} in

Re: [OSM-dev] xapi status?

2009-05-01 Thread 80n
This characteristically happens if all the daemons are busy servicing other people's requests. The server you are accessing is not particularly fast. The other xapi servers are faster and can handle more capacity. Most people use the xapi instance on the telascience server:

Re: [OSM-dev] mapnik

2009-05-01 Thread Chris Jones
On 1 May 2009, at 07:31, Mohamad Ali wrote: Hi guys I have this situation: u...@pc1:~$ cd mapnik u...@pc1:~/mapnik$ source set-mapnik-env nothing happen on the screen ./customize-mapnik-map $MAPNIK_MAP_FILE nothing happen on the screen That's expected. In the unix world unless

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Chris Browet
Thomas Wood wrote: Others have stated before that the mime type option is really the only sane one for this sort of thing, rather than the awful localhost URIs the the JOSM remote control uses presently. Call me biased but I find a certain elegance in the way these awful localhost URIs do

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Chris Browet
Thomas Wood wrote: Others have stated before that the mime type option is really the only sane one for this sort of thing, rather than the awful localhost URIs the the JOSM remote control uses presently. Call me biased but I find a certain elegance in the way these awful localhost URIs do

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Chris Browet wrote: Furthermore, for a packaged tool as merkaartor, the registering of the mime extension can be done at installation time, leading to near zero config for the user... Provided you are on a system where you have the permissions to install software packages! Bye Frederik

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Chris Browet
2009/5/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Hi, Chris Browet wrote: Furthermore, for a packaged tool as merkaartor, the registering of the mime extension can be done at installation time, leading to near zero config for the user... Provided you are on a system where you have the

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Dave Stubbs
2009/5/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Hi, Thomas Wood wrote: Others have stated before that the mime type option is really the only sane one for this sort of thing, rather than the awful localhost URIs the the JOSM remote control uses presently. Call me biased but I find a certain

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Fairhurst wrote: Tom Hughes wrote: Richard Fairhurst wrote: Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: IMHO it would be much nicer to choose everytime you click Edit for 2 reasons: - users tend to use both editors because some features are unique

[OSM-dev] status of dev and test APIs?

2009-05-01 Thread Karl Guggisberg
hi, I today tried to acces the dev and test APIs on apis.dev.openstreetmap.org but they seem to be down. Are there any dev or test API instances availabe after the API switch to 0.6? Regards Karl ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-dev] status of dev and test APIs?

2009-05-01 Thread Ed Loach
Karl wrote: I today tried to acces the dev and test APIs on apis.dev.openstreetmap.org but they seem to be down. Are there any dev or test API instances availabe after the API switch to 0.6? If you're trying at the moment, there are network issues that might be affecting access:

Re: [OSM-dev] status of dev and test APIs?

2009-05-01 Thread Shaun McDonald
Hi, Works fine for me: http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/453 These test servers will continue to be maintained for the time being. Shaun On 1 May 2009, at 13:29, Karl Guggisberg wrote: hi, I today tried to acces the dev and test APIs on apis.dev.openstreetmap.org but

Re: [OSM-dev] User preference for editor

2009-05-01 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dave Stubbs wrote: Over eager firewall's permitting of course. Protecting localhost from accesses originating on localhost would indeed be *very* eager. Is that common behaviour on any platform? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33

[OSM-dev] Loading a 0.6 osm file into postgres with osmosis

2009-05-01 Thread Joachim Zobel
Hi. I successfully used osmosis to load the cuurent map of germany into the postgres schema from Brett Henderson: http://gweb.bretth.com/apidb06-pgsql-latest.sql Here is a short Howto: 1. I split the above skript into 2 parts at the COPY statements. 2. I ran the first part to create the schema

[OSM-dev] bad pngs from mod_tile / renderd meta files

2009-05-01 Thread jburns
Hi, I am having a problem in that the pngs being generated and returned by my apache renderd mapnik process are not proper pngs in that they are rejected by various file viewers as being malformed. I have compiled, built and run renderd against the latest mapnik svn. I have configured apache

Re: [OSM-dev] bad pngs from mod_tile / renderd meta files

2009-05-01 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Viernes, 1 de Mayo de 2009, jburns escribió: I am having a problem in that the pngs being generated and returned by my apache renderd mapnik process are not proper pngs in that they are rejected by various file viewers as being malformed. [...] Any ideas or tips where to start debugging

Re: [OSM-dev] bad pngs from mod_tile / renderd meta files

2009-05-01 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 10:59 -0700, jburns wrote: Hi, I am having a problem in that the pngs being generated and returned by my apache renderd mapnik process are not proper pngs in that they are rejected by various file viewers as being malformed. I have compiled, built and run renderd

[josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-01 Thread Henrik Niehaus
Hi JOSM coders, I came across several problems and feature requests for GPX files while looking at the bug tracker and reading this list. So I decided to learn a new technology and gave JAXB a try. The result is a JOSM, which fully supports GPX 1.0 and 1.1, because JAXB uses the xml schemas to