Re: [OSM-dev] Code for OSTN02?

2009-10-20 Thread John McKerrell
On 19 Oct 2009, at 23:19, TimSC wrote: Thomas Wood wrote: Good luck, this is the one projection that the OS actually sell for professional uses. I thought that OSTN02 wouldn't actually be needed unless for the very high precision stuff. The standard OSGB36 transform should be good enough

[josm-dev] New projection for JOSM

2009-10-20 Thread Pieren
Hi, Could someone from the core team apply the following patch: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3737 adding a new projection required by the cadastre-fr plugin. Since 10 days, the French cadastre WMS has changed the projection for two third of the municipalities from the old Lambert 4 zones

Re: [josm-dev] Plugin Popularity

2009-10-20 Thread MP
instead of today's JOSM/1.5 (2069 SVN en_GB) Java/1.6.0_0 I would transmit JOSM/1.5 (2069 SVN en_GB; wmsplugin, validator, slippymap) Java/1.6.0_0 This could create some network overhead - there are 39 plugins in JOSM's official plugin list, of those I have personally 16 installed

Re: [josm-dev] Plugin Popularity

2009-10-20 Thread Ľubomír Varga
Vhat about to make it legal? As in eclipse or netbeans, show to user one page, where will be writen, that josm coul monitor his ussage off josm sw and report it to its autors to improve future versions. Only uploaded data will be a list of plugins. This upload will be done on any change in used

Re: [josm-dev] Plugin Popularity

2009-10-20 Thread SLXViper
Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, the number of plugins becomes ever larger, which is good. I would like to amend the JOSM User-Agent header to contain not only version and language, but also a list of installed plugins - e.g. instead of today's JOSM/1.5 (2069 SVN en_GB) Java/1.6.0_0 I