Re: [OSM-dev] tirex problem creating Debian/Ubuntu packages under Ubuntu 10.04

2010-11-24 Thread Sven Geggus
Peter Körner wrote: > Sorry, you're right. I'd love to see a version of this how to with > mapnik 0.8.0 on a debian unstable or testing system. 0.8 has not yet been releasead AFAIK and would require major changes in our styles anyway. Debian testing has 0.7.1 Sven -- "The only thing we hav

Re: [OSM-dev] tirex problem creating Debian/Ubuntu packages under Ubuntu 10.04

2010-11-24 Thread Peter Körner
Am 21.11.2010 12:36, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, Peter Körner wrote: If you want a brand-new breaking-edge mapnik svn version, check this HowTo (german): This is a very good howto but you shouldn't claim that 0.7.1 is a "brand new

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM Mapnik Fonts are Nonsense

2010-11-24 Thread Matthew Wechsler
So I finally re-imported using UTF8 (not WIN1252) and started rendering again...things look much better! Thanks for all your help! On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Peter Körner wrote: > >> See result here: http://b.imagehost.org/0738/Chad.jpg >> >> Could this be my issue? > > So it seems your rend

Re: [osmosis-dev] Get underlying timestamp string

2010-11-24 Thread Brett Henderson
Hi Rafael, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Rafael Troilo wrote: > Hello, > > At the moment I use: > > XmlTimestampFormat xmlTimestampFormat = new XmlTimestampFormat(); > TimestampContainer tc = entity.getTimestampContainer(); > String timestamp = tc.getFormattedTimestamp(xmlTimestampFormat); >

Re: [OSM-dev] API question: why was the diff upload call added to the API?

2010-11-24 Thread Tom Hughes
On 24/11/10 08:24, Joseph Koshy wrote: > Could someone with knowledge of the history of the OSM API please > help: what was the use case for the "diff upload" API (see {1}) > introduced in API version 0.6? I.e., why were atomic changes deemed > desirable? Well the starting point was changesets r

Re: [osmosis-dev] Osmosis and retrieving relations+ways+nodes

2010-11-24 Thread Brett Henderson
Hi Rudi, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Rudi Alberda wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm wondering if it is possible to retrieve relations with osmosis in the > same way as it can be done through the XAPI. When I query data through the > XAPI, based on relations (for example: > http://xapi.openstr

Re: [OSM-dev] Is there a way to use simple schema without hstore

2010-11-24 Thread Brett Henderson
Hi Sarah, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Sarah Hoffmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Andreas Kalsch wrote: > >> If you're applying diffs to the database you can enhance the > >> osmosisUpdate() function (initially empty, but can be customised) to > >> keep your separate

Re: [OSM-dev] Is there a way to use simple schema without hstore

2010-11-24 Thread Brett Henderson
Hi Andreas, On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Andreas Kalsch wrote: > Hi, > > thank you, Brett, for me this is the perfect setup. I hope that others will > find it useful as well. The names are OK. Two problems: > > 1) I read XML or PBF, dump it to CSV and then read the dump, but now my > featur

[OSM-dev] API question: why was the diff upload call added to the API?

2010-11-24 Thread Joseph Koshy
Could someone with knowledge of the history of the OSM API please help: what was the use case for the "diff upload" API (see {1}) introduced in API version 0.6? I.e., why were atomic changes deemed desirable? The atomicity requirement for this API call makes it somewhat difficult to scale. {1}