[OSM-dev] osm2pgsql, -e option might affect too many tiles

2011-08-31 Thread marqqs
Hello, I'm using osm2pgsql with the excellent -e option which allows me to generate dirty-tiles lists. It's my observation that the output can be somewhat extensive if you just change ONE node. For example: I change the name of a single node. This causes osm2pgsql to put not only the node's ti

Re: [OSM-dev] java osm renderer

2011-08-31 Thread Sven Geggus
BG wrote: > But the geometry column (which comes with postgis) confuses me, this is > a bunch of numbers. It's a OGC standard Format called Well Known Binary (WKB) Postgis provides a funktion (astext) which will transform it to WKT (Well known text). http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards R

Re: [OSM-dev] java osm renderer

2011-08-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/31 BG : > Hej. > > I want to try to make a renderer with java. But i do not know how i get the > geometry information and interpret it. > I think it would be easy to make sql requests about the objects to get. But > the geometry column (which comes with postgis) confuses me, this is a bunch

[OSM-dev] java osm renderer

2011-08-31 Thread BG
Hej. I want to try to make a renderer with java. But i do not know how i get the geometry information and interpret it. I think it would be easy to make sql requests about the objects to get. But the geometry column (which comes with postgis) confuses me, this is a bunch of numbers. Are there

[OSM-dev] OSM Data to Distance Matrix

2011-08-31 Thread James Carlo Plaras
Good day, I am working on a project related to arc routing as a part of my undergraduate special problem. I wish to "parse / convert" the osm data file to a distance matrix. Are there existing libraries for converting osm data to distance matrix (or something close)? Thank you for reading the ma

Re: [OSM-dev] Osm2pgsql and failed planet import

2011-08-31 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
On 08/30/2011 11:50 AM, John Smith wrote: > osm2pgsql doesn't have any code to check for memory allocation > failures and to deal with it in a sane way, it just assumes all > allocations are fine until it checks the nodes when going over pending > ways etc. Anthony posted a patch a couple of month