> -Original Message-
> From: Ákos Maróy [mailto:a...@maroy.hu]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:22 PM
> To: dev@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-dev] having a regularly updated OSM database?
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what is the best way to have a regularly updated, up-to-date
> OSM databas
Hi All,
I am trying to put together a little android application that works out
where it is, and sends the info on a text message to someone (it is for
someone who can not talk well).
The location finding and SMS bits are working now, but the location is
lat/lon, which is not very friendly for the
Hi,
I wonder what is the best way to have a regularly updated, up-to-date
OSM database? By regularly, I mean an update about say once a month.
Previously I experimented with osm2pgsql, but that took me 5 days to
import, and the 'update' process was on the same order of magnitude.
(this is on an i
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Sven Geggus > wrote:
>
>> Cartinus wrote:
>>
>> > That would already be achieved with GPL. You don't need AGPL for that.
>>
>> You might be right. Given that the analogy is as follows:
>> (mapnik=compile
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Sven Geggus
wrote:
> Cartinus wrote:
>
> > That would already be achieved with GPL. You don't need AGPL for that.
>
> You might be right. Given that the analogy is as follows:
> (mapnik=compiler, stylefile=sourcecode, tile=binary)
>
> Distributing tiles without s
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Cartinus wrote:
> That would already be achieved with GPL. You don't need AGPL for that.
Well AGPL http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html covers public propagation
and network interaction, the GPL does not. Under the gpl you would be able
to create modified
Cartinus wrote:
> That would already be achieved with GPL. You don't need AGPL for that.
You might be right. Given that the analogy is as follows:
(mapnik=compiler, stylefile=sourcecode, tile=binary)
Distributing tiles without stylefile would be like distributing
binaries without sourcecode.
S
On 04/10/2012 04:06 PM, Sven Geggus wrote:
> If somebody takes the style and runs a derived style on his own
> tileserver his changes should be contributed back to the project (IMO).
That would already be achieved with GPL. You don't need AGPL for that.
---
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
_
Hi,
On 04/10/2012 06:56 PM, Paul Hartmann wrote:
On 04/10/2012 05:31 PM, Sven Geggus wrote:
People are already doing bussiness using proprietary styles (e.g.
http://francetopo.fr/) [...]
There are also businesses publishing styles under permissive license (MIT):
https://github.com/MapQuest/Ma
On 04/10/2012 05:31 PM, Sven Geggus wrote:
> People are already doing bussiness using proprietary styles (e.g.
> http://francetopo.fr/) [...]
There are also businesses publishing styles under permissive license (MIT):
https://github.com/MapQuest/MapQuest-Mapnik-Style
Paul
___
2012/4/10 Mike Dupont :
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Komяpa wrote:
>>
>> If mapnik sytlesheet will become AGPL we'll have to get rid of our
>> local instance
>
> or keep the old version that has a different license, which is unknown.
There is no such thing as a different unknown old licens
Komяpa wrote:
> If mapnik sytlesheet will become AGPL we'll have to get rid of our
> local instance, just to make sure our stylesheet won't be affected.
I have not been talking about changing the (unknown) licence of the original
mapnik stylesheet but of our germanstyle which is a derivative.
I
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Komяpa wrote:
> If mapnik sytlesheet will become AGPL we'll have to get rid of our
> local instance
>
or keep the old version that has a different license, which is unknown.
mike
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://f
> If somebody takes the style and runs a derived style on his own
> tileserver his changes should be contributed back to the project (IMO).
If mapnik sytlesheet will become AGPL we'll have to get rid of our
local instance, just to make sure our stylesheet won't be affected.
Too viral licenses are
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> The shields are mine, and I think the core highway colours (motorway, trunk,
> primary, secondary) might be too, and I'm happy to see them go under WTFPL.
> (But, AGPL, ugh.)
The reason why I have been thinking about AGPL ist that Mapnik stuff is
usually deployed as a
Paul Hartmann wrote:
> I've started emailing the authors some time ago. The main
> contributors (Steve Chilton and Lennard) would license their
> work under the terms of CC0. So do the following
> committers: artem, nick, spaetz, tomhughes. A few people
> I haven't contacted so far.
The shield
On 04/10/2012 02:28 PM, Sven Geggus wrote:
> Hello altogether,
>
> with the upcoming adoption of the ODBL for OSM data the licence of common
> Mapnik styles will definitely get more important!
I've started emailing the authors some time ago. The main contributors
(Steve Chilton and Lennard) would
Hello altogether,
with the upcoming adoption of the ODBL for OSM data the licence of common
Mapnik styles will definitely get more important!
I strongly feel the need of a decent map style to be distributed under a
copyleft style licence (IMO Affero GPL would be best suited, but IANAL) to
make sh
18 matches
Mail list logo
