#4626: Potlatch2 toolbox disappears
--+
Reporter: SomeoneElse | Owner: potlatch-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone:
Component: potlatch2|Version:
Resolution:
Hi
no it was a mistake.
Basicly atm there is one huge nested map, that holds all required
information:
nodemap[Objekt-ID][Timestamp] = (lat, lon)
lat/lon is atm stored as double. The suggested memory layout is as follows:
1. An Array with a 32bit Pointer for each Node-ID
2. A
Hi
Am 12.10.2012 16:14, schrieb Serge Wroclawski: I made a second issue at
the same time regarding gathering histrorical
data around way geometry. Right now, due to the way OSM stores its
geometry data, the only way to know about a way's geometry history is
to call the history call for the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:48:24PM -0700, John Firebaugh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Exporting raw data was never the primary purpose of the export tab - it was
really added to address the constant request for the ability to export
images of an
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012, at 11:09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
- How could the Mapnik style be more open to improvements? We
definitely need to get it on GitHub.
I don't think the version control system used makes a difference - I
doubt the 400+ issues filed against the current style would be
On 16/10/12 05:42, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Exporting raw data was never the primary purpose of the export tab - it was
really added to address the constant request for the ability to export
images of an area.
Do we have
Well, I care about the mapper who is interested in an agreed final result
and doesn't want to spend his time reading the opinion of individual
persons. Just for this there's a talk page for each wiki page. When
interested you can subscribe to the talk page separately. If the talk page
isn't enough
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012, at 01:03, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
If you propose to change it by creating a community-driven
(instead of admin-driven as you put it) wishlist, by any means - do
it. The operative word being do.
I'll be glad to do so, and will start it. Unless the MapBox team
Matt (or others who might know) -
Is there a staging (or some other kind of) version of OWL alive that I could
look at?
Alex Barth
http://twitter.com/lxbarth
tel (+1) 202 250 3633
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 09:32 -0400, Alex Barth wrote:
Matt (or others who might know) -
Is there a staging (or some other kind of) version of OWL alive that I could
look at?
sadly not. the version on dev (which was crushing it) died under its own
weight a while ago. the situation back in
fr == Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
fr In Wikipedia, all user-to-user messages are automatically public
fr (unless both parties agree to take it to email). Maybe food for
fr thought - do we need private messages at all? There seem to be
fr quite a number of bullies in OSM who
fr == Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
- Should SVG export be replaced with something else, or improved in
Mapnik enough to be worthwhile?
fr Definitely a question that I am often asked - keep in mind that there
fr are two kinds of SVG, that which conforms to the standard and
The problem I see is, other than pointing to planet.openstreetmap.org I'm
not sure where else we would send them?
While there are lots of other places to get things like regional extracts
they are unofficial third party sites so I don't think that we should be
referring people to them from the
Hi All,
I'm relatively new to processing the OSM datasets and trying to extract
interesting data. What I'm trying to do is build a dataset of all UK roads.
I first used osmosis with a way filter based on the highway tag, which
worked reasonably well. However, when I delved into the data, I
On 16/10/12 16:40, Tom MacWright wrote:
The problem I see is, other than pointing to planet.openstreetmap.org
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/ I'm not sure where else we would send
them?
While there are lots of other places to get things like regional extracts they
are unofficial third party
Tom Hughes wrote:
As to other sites, the problems are several fold - how do we decide to
bless one particular site over another? not to mention the fact that
we might end up driving more traffic to such sites than they could
handle.
From a purely end-user perspective, having lots of
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 16/10/12 16:40, Tom MacWright wrote:
The problem I see is, other than pointing to planet.openstreetmap.org
http://planet.openstreetmap.**org/ http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
I'm not sure where else we would send
them?
Hi
The current OSB integration work into osm.org, will this include the OSB
API? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetBugs/API#Editing_bugs
Users of OSM data on their websites would be interested to integrate bug
reporting directly into their application.
Thanks
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron
Hi David,
did you find out exactly where in your toolchain these nodes get lost?
Maybe it's the filter process with Osmosis? I wouldn't assume a bug, I think
it's more likely a misunderstanding in how the program options should be used.
I'm not sure about the official API definition but it
Hi Markus,
I ditched osmosis because I wanted to know where they were being dropped so
wrote my own filter tool which gave the same results. Looks like it's just
how it is, but I'm wondering what the point of a way with broken noderefs
is. Is it corruption or a feature?
David
On Tue, Oct 16,
Hi,
On 16.10.2012 17:32, Eric Marsden wrote:
fr thought - do we need private messages at all? There seem to be
fr quite a number of bullies in OSM who send self-important messages
fr to lesser experienced mappers explaining their rules... that
fr could be stopped if all messages were public.
Hi,
On 16.10.2012 18:34, David Prime wrote:
I ditched osmosis because I wanted to know where they were being dropped
so wrote my own filter tool which gave the same results. Looks like it's
just how it is, but I'm wondering what the point of a way with broken
noderefs is. Is it corruption or a
As to other sites, the problems are several fold - how do we decide to
bless one particular site over another?
Please be honest. You, I, and everbody else also set preferences on at best
educated guesses, often more trust in what or whom we know or don't know. We
use OpenLayers and not
Hi David,
David Prime writes:
wrote my own filter tool which gave the same results. Looks like it's just
how it is, but I'm wondering what the point of a way with broken noderefs
is. Is it corruption or a feature?
There shouldn't be that many missings refs at all.
What is the source of
There shouldn't be that many missings refs at all.
What is the source of your England dump? Is it contained there? I read
your sentence below that it is already missing in your input file.
Stephan
It's just your standard dump from
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:48 PM, John Firebaugh
john.fireba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Exporting raw data was never the primary purpose of the export tab - it was
really added to address the constant request for the ability to export
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I agree with John that there is a need for a clear path for folks to
the various data consumption options. I believe the Export tab should
really be the Data tab, with options for
* immediately downloading the current map
2012/10/16 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu:
The problem I see is, other than pointing to planet.openstreetmap.org I'm
not sure where else we would send them?
You could point them here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Downloading_data
I think what is really missing are some short explanations,
Wow, that page does look a lot like what I concocted this morning -
see earlier in the thread or here is the link again:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dASGp5U0jRNZ3Kzb-LtzeOtUACqlLVh9GZdiKTftTOQ/edit
My major concern with that page, now that I know it's there, is that
there is no
I really like how activity streams shows easy-to-understand changes on the map
using changemonger [1,2]. At the same time it creates an alternative break down
of changes that is more granular than changesets. This diverts attention from
_comments on changesets_. This is not ideal in my mind -
On 17/10/12 00:04, Alex Barth wrote:
- What are the recommendations for change set sizes?
Personally I tend to put everything that is logically grouped together
in one changeset where possible.
But by that I mean that I'll spend a few hours out collecting data in a
small area and then
Hi Alex,
What do you mean by large? Do you mean changesets that span a large
area (spanning whole continents)? Or changesets that have a lot of
objects modified (perhaps more than 1000)?
Based on the examples you provided, it seems you mean the former. Is
this correct?
Eugene
On Wed, Oct 17,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jon Burgess jburgess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 11:08 -0400, jpk wrote:
The hash directory thing is good, and I can get that sorted (yay,
progress!), but it doesn't explain all the sea-colored tiles at =z23
for tiles that aren't yet cached.
Eugene - right, I mean changesets that are geographically large.
On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
What do you mean by large? Do you mean changesets that span a large
area (spanning whole continents)? Or changesets that have a lot of
This would mean folding http://planet.osm.org/ into a future data tab, no?
How do the planet osm maintainers see this?
http://planet.openstreetmap.org is the interface from the main DB to all kind
of data consuming services, including the renderers, Nominatim, Overpass API
and several others.
On 10/17/2012 01:04 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
I really like how activity streams shows easy-to-understand changes
on the map using changemonger [1,2]. At the same time it creates an
alternative break down of changes that is more granular than
changesets.
This diverts attention from _comments on
On 10/17/2012 01:04 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13514072
wheelmap_visitor is sort of a bot, it uploads changes made
to the wheelchair=* accessibility tags by anonymous users
on http://wheelmap.org/
It only touches that one tag. It generates a new
37 matches
Mail list logo
