Salut,
Je ne connais pas se problème, mais une piste: as tu essayer l'OpenJdk 7 ?
Après avoir installer plusieurs JVM (avec apt-get) tu peux basculer de
l'une à l'autre avec l'outil
$ sudo update-alternatives --config java
Par exemple sur ma bécane:
$ sudo update-alternatives --list java
#4860: my business address is shown in wrong location
---+
Reporter: NMaxwell | Owner: potlatch-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: potlatch2 |Version:
Keywords:
#4860: my business address is shown in wrong location
+
Reporter: NMaxwell | Owner: potlatch-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: potlatch2 |Version:
Resolution:
On 15.05.13 23:34, Rob Nickerson wrote:
For transparency I suggested that the SotM conference being promoted and for
other events I suggested that we include a prominent events banner
NACK to any promotion on the front page of osm.org. SOTM (international) ist the
only thing that can be
Hello Andreas,
SotM-EU, in Vienna, was a wonderful event. You and your team did a great job
organizing it and I'm really pleased to have been there.
Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would
now, because the policy has changed.
The local event in the US
On 16 May 2013 13:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would
now, because the policy has changed.
SoTM-EU was 2011.
If there was a policy change it was in 2012:
Add a banner for SOTM US
On 16/05/13 13:05, Richard Weait wrote:
Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would
now, because the policy has changed.
If policy has changed then could somebody please document what the new
policy is so that I am able to apply it when considering your
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 16/05/13 13:05, Richard Weait wrote:
Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you
would now, because the policy has changed.
If policy has changed then could somebody please document what the
Hi
Sounds like this issue should be directed to the CWG to discuss, and define the
guidelines and process more clearly.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
Cc: dev
Hi, I'm new to the list, wanted to introduce myself. I'm Tac Tacelosky, a
developer in Washington DC working on an editor that would allow people
looking at panoramic images (aka street views), to create and edit OSM
amenities and other elements. We are a North American distributor for a
On 16/05/13 17:47, Tac Tacelosky wrote:
I wanted to confirm that the API is still using OAuth 1.0 and not 1.0a
or 2.0. Is there any development going on in that area? Or any
recommendations / advice?
We support 1.0 and 1.0a but 1.0a is what you should target for any new
application - we
Hi,
I have no idea what the CWG vote was on and I can't find the up to date
minutes to check it. Despite this, you much surely recognise the issue. For
example, even if we restrict the banners to just those promoting
conferences then we could easily have a rotation of 5 or more banners:
* SOTM
*
Thanks, I've updated the wiki page at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OAuth#Usage_for_developers accordingly,
before it said that only 1.0 was supported, not 1.0a.
Tac
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
We support 1.0 and 1.0a but 1.0a is what you should
13 matches
Mail list logo